number 6 wrote:
so why would pearson tell us the players have already been signed!? unless we were never signing bateman and whitehead until the situation at the bulls was resolved.
When did pearson say we'd signed chase, bateman or whitehead?
he said we had 7 signed, which it now transpires included pitts, watts, ellis and arundell. Add in crookes and there are only 2 we don't yet know about. He also said we were looking at a couple of others which probably included chase, holdsworth and paea at the time