bonaire wrote:
Not so much the referee but he did ping Sam Tomkins for an incorrect play the ball when his head was clearly held between the legs of a St Helens player.That should have been a free kick to Catalan
Nope - ironically the referees have been really (amazingly) consistent on this all year; if you cant keep your feet, then you shouldn't play the ball. Catalans should/would have gotten a back to 6 if he didnt play the ball, but since he fell over, it was the right decision.
bonaire wrote:
However the blatant ones were not really the fault of the referee
When a Catalan kick to touch that just made touch but was batted back into play by Coote should have been spotted by the linesman who clearly didnt know the rules.
Its not so much he didnt know the rules as the linesman was following the ball intently and thus not watching Cootes feet. I agree this is wrong and a bad one, dont agree its amateurish or had any impact on the overall game.
bonaire wrote:
Catalan should have been awarded a penalty try after Makinsons head high tackle was the only thing stopping the winger grounding the ball.
The referee however did ask the video ref as part of the conversation if it was a penalty try.
Dont know who the video ref was but clearly got that wrong
Again, no. For it to be a penalty try we would have to be 100% certain that if Makinson hadn't made contact with the head, then he would have scored. We can't say that. Makinson had already made contact on the shoulder, we have no idea if that contact alone would have been enough for him to be pushed out/ fall over short and let the cover catch up/ force an error on falling etc etc etc. The simple answer is we dont know, so it can't be a penalty try. Theres almost an identical set of what ifs for the Saints no try for Joe Batchelor when Maloney shoulder charges him, but don't remember anyone decrying that decision as Catalans came back to win in MW? There were also worse high tackles in the game (Kasiano on Roby, Garcia on Lomax) which didn't bring a sin bin, and an argument for an 8 point try for Naiqama given Yaha kneed him in the head during the act of scoring.
bonaire wrote:
I understand the Catalan chairmans reaction but think it was said in the heat of the moment due to disappointment.,Thats not to say we dont need improvement in the officials
I have said that if we dont adopt a two referee system which is unlikely then do away with the in goal official as its not needed.
Use the officials as second linesmen so that we have in effect 4 linesmen each covering one quarter of the pitch.
Easy to keep up with all the play covering only 50 metres and give them more responsibility than just sticking their flag up
But where are we going to get those additional referees from? Who would want to be a referee in this constant climate that allows Guasch's comments as "but that doesnt mean improvement is needed". Our current culture in Rugby League is to blame anyone else for everything we can. Can the officials do better? Of course, much like players theyre only human. But unlike players who concede a high shot, or are offside, we dont go to the press and publicly question their question their aptitude and bias.