Dave K. wrote:
Big 3 weeks for Agar, if he doens't sign another player and we go with what we have then we will struggle IMO and he should get the boot, sign another player hopefully a halfback then I think we could do well.
If we dont sign anyone he only has himself to blame as there has been players that would have improved our squad that he has choose not to sign.
Just a cotton-pickin'-minute there... everyone seems to be talking about a half-back for cover. So if our half-backs are fit (I know, I know... bear with me) then it's possible that such a new signing would never get a game and, therefore, have no bearing on the season whatsoever. So why would you sack Agar for that?
Before Berrigan went, he was scrum-half cover with Nicklas as cover for Horne. Berrigan left very late in the day and it's not as if there are hundreds of quality half-backs out there who are (1) available and (2) would want to come and sit on the bench (this is probably why they're after Sammut because he's a full-back). So how can this be Agar's fault? I mean, I understand that everything from the floods in Australia to the lack of good quality physicists emerging from British universities is Agar's fault, but we do have to draw the line somewhere.