Karen wrote:
That's because he saw the U23 side we fielded on a par with your team, so I can understand his disappointment.
Although the average age of the two teams were close, the experience was vastly in Rovers' favour. That raises two questions. Why are players with an average age of 22 so inexperienced compared with a team with an average of 23? Why did Radford believe that a team with so little experience and proven ability at that level believe they were on a par with our team?