Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:28 pm  

Thank you paul

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:39 pm  

FC-Steward wrote:

Also got told there's a few more of gentles signings radders doesn't rate or want in his squad , but is finding it hard getting rid of them as most are on stupid money and long term deals .

McDonnell , Pitts , miller and Arundel are the names I've heard . Arundel is on a rolling contract starting at 60k and ends up at 120k if true wtf

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:45 pm  

Legends and Icons wrote:

McDonnell , Pitts , miller and Arundel are the names I've heard . Arundel is on a rolling contract starting at 60k and ends up at 120k if true wtf

I can understand why McDonnell and Miller are on very good money but the other two, just wouldn't make any sense!

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:47 pm  

Legends and Icons wrote:

McDonnell , Pitts , miller and Arundel are the names I've heard . Arundel is on a rolling contract starting at 60k and ends up at 120k if true wtf

Thompson hasn't come cheap either , and millers wage is stupid if true . So looks like another few years till we get the squad sorted and the coach has the players he wants .

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:48 pm  

Legends and Icons wrote:

McDonnell , Pitts , miller and Arundel are the names I've heard . Arundel is on a rolling contract starting at 60k and ends up at 120k if true wtf

It was interesting at Featherstone that Miller and Arundel were the ones left out with the kids almost as if they'd done something wrong. I said at the time that there was absolutely no point in Arundel being out there in the second half other than to damage his confidence and Miller was always on when we had a junior/lightweight pack out there - not that that made any difference as it was - but he's had no chance to even try to form a partnership with Rankin for example. If he is trying to freeze players out then I can't imagine that it will be good for morale generally.

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:49 pm  

All these players can't be on stupid money! There's a cap in place!

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:51 pm  

FC-Steward wrote:

Thompson hasn't come cheap either , and millers wage is stupid if true . So looks like another few years till we get the squad sorted and the coach has the players he wants .

If Miller's wage is stupid then I'd have thought it would make more sense to play the guy and try to manage him to get him to fulfill his potential otherwise as you say we just keep waiting and waiting and waiting...............

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 4:52 pm  

FC-Steward wrote:

Thompson hasn't come cheap either , and millers wage is stupid if true . So looks like another few years till we get the squad sorted and the coach has the players he wants .

Now you are joking!!!

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:14 pm  

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... C/?ref=rss Chris28 wrote: Does it? Got a link to that? their you go my friend. pretty sure im not the first to mention Pitts possibly going in the opposite direction to Carvell too, yet you chose not to pull others up, I wonder why that is.

http://www.thetelegraphandargus.co.uk/s ... C/?ref=rss Chris28 wrote: Does it? Got a link to that? their you go my friend. pretty sure im not the first to mention Pitts possibly going in the opposite direction to Carvell too, yet you chose not to pull others up, I wonder why that is.

Re: gareth carvell : Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:16 pm  

good bit of business if we get carv's in to bulk the pack up