: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:41 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Would play Tommy Lee at 7 before Houghton.

So would I.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:43 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Would play Tommy Lee at 7 before Houghton.

You are possibly/probably right, I was thinking more of a shake up than anything permenant (but not this weekend), looking at it as another option seeing as TL failed at 7 last season, that could have been down to having Washy at 6 most of the time a stranger to that position.

Look at how the game is moving on, Saints have played Roby at SH, and look at Wilkin at 6 yesterday, he also played at 6 in his youth, Gilmour at centre. Moves like that are how the game is evolving rather than those 3 mentioned being 'utility' they are taking it to the next level IMO.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:48 pm  

abel711989 wrote:

:lol:

You're kidding right?????

Not in the slightest

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 12:58 pm  

Or is Agars game plan to lull Rovers into thinking that they are crap by losing a couple of games and then spring the trap on Friday??


no were just shart!!

King has been less than average ..
Berrigan was awful too which surprised me...

Thorman looked clueless

Horne was runnig backwards and forwards with no one offering themselves as a runner.

I think there is bigger issues than we know at present

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:01 pm  

Gordon Gekko wrote:

Would play Tommy Lee at 7 before Houghton.

I'd play Moa at 7 before Tommy Lee.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:15 pm  

If they cant get fired up to play against that dirty shower form the east, then they need kicking out.

This is THE game we want to win every year, simple as

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 1:26 pm  

Hull Kingston Convicts wrote:

If they cant get fired up to play against that dirty shower form the east, then they need kicking out.

This is THE game we want to win every year, simple as

I'd quite happily lose this one if we had won the last 3.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:09 pm  

Enough is enough for me. lets have 2 different half backs cos the two we have had all season aint doing their job and earning their monies (which we pay )

1 R Horne (potentially best full back in country, not living up to expectations as a half back)
2 M Calderwood
3 G Horne
4 K Yeaman
5 T Briscoe
6 R Whiting (give him chance to see if he can do better than Thorman and Horne)
7 T Lee ( give him a chance cos at least he plays with desire and passion to have a go and at least try to earn his money)
8 E Dowes
9 S Berrigan
10 J Thackarey
11 L Radford
12 D Tickle
13 D Washbrook

14 W Manu ( ffs give the man a rest to be more of a handful when he gets on. jesus you dont buy a rolls royce and go scrabbling in it do you? )
15 P Cusack ( to spell Dowes)
16 P King ( to spell Thackaray)
17 C Hall (Utility players to fill whatever gaps appear)

RESTED
Moa to get him fit by playing full games in reserves
DROPPED
Thorman cos he's like curry. only worth paying for if its hot and he ain't

I'd have Radford swapping left and right sides to spell Tickle and Manu as long as one of those two were always on pitch if not both.

may be drastic changing both half backs but we got everything to gain by finding two players that can do the job

8 games and no signs of the present 2 been good enough

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:28 pm  

My 17 would be.

Hall
Calderwood
G Horne
Yeaman
Briscoe
R Horne
Thorman
Dowes
Berrigan
Cusack
Radford
Tickle
Whiting

Houghton
Manu
Thackeray (if problems sorted)
Moa

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 2:47 pm  

No chance. Thorman at 7. Hall DEFINATELY not on the wing. Lee on the bench. I'd like to start with Dowes and King but i don't expect it.