[Karen]

Re: westerman : Sun Oct 25, 2015 10:33 pm  

*1865* wrote:

Further problem, and one hopefully Chris28 could answer - If Micheals moves clubs, wouldn't he need to apply for a new visa? Whereas he wouldn't to stay on here.

He might do even if he stays with us, was he a one year initially with further options? If so, his initial visa might be just a year long one.

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:50 am  

*1865* wrote:

Further problem, and one hopefully Chris28 could answer - If Micheals moves clubs, wouldn't he need to apply for a new visa? Whereas he wouldn't to stay on here.

Dont quote me.., but if he's changed UK employer,

I think he needs a new work permit...and a new UK Visa to remain..

IF... the allegation in QLD, is still current,it would be difficult
to renew his visa.. -IMO

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 7:54 am  

Carney to Hull not happening according to League Weekly

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 8:57 am  

Headline reads 'Hull Players veto Carney move' and article states that it was a 'done deal' on Thursday but as rumours leaked out 'the management were asked if they would speak with the players first who then rejected the player joining them'

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 9:14 am  

The Dentist Wilf wrote:

Headline reads 'Hull Players veto Carney move' and article states that it was a 'done deal' on Thursday but as rumours leaked out 'the management were asked if they would speak with the players first who then rejected the player joining them'

Seems strange that,can players actually do that?

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:01 am  

I find it amazing (if its true) that a club which has suffered adversely as a result of "player power" over at least the last 10 years should allow its players to have a veto over who it does or does not sign.

Can anyone imagine Leeds or Wigan doing this?

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:12 am  

@James_Smailes: I see there's plenty people saying FC are signing Justin Carney. 95% chance that won't happen as it stands. There was an enquiry, no deal.

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 10:29 am  

Diogenes wrote:

I find it amazing (if its true) that a club which has suffered adversely as a result of "player power" over at least the last 10 yeas should allow its players to have a veto over who it does or does not sign.

Can anyone imagine Leeds or Wigan doing this?

If it's true and there was a player vote/discussion on signing Carney, it would have been a complete one off I imagine due to the what went on at Cas and the personal link to Jordan Thompson.

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:22 am  

plus theres maybe more to this than we know, shame as a good player, but if its gonna rock the boat well I can see why, So who else should we be looking at ?

Re: westerman : Mon Oct 26, 2015 11:26 am  

Or maybe it was all a smoke screen from the start, to make it look like Pearson was willing to invest the westerman money . But infact never was!! Just my conspiracy theory side of me ha