: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:20 am  

Wire now want cash for Gleeson and not players.(Daily Star ) http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/74865/Warriors-battle-for-Mart/

Wire now want cash for Gleeson and not players.(Daily Star ) http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/74865/Warriors-battle-for-Mart/

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:23 am  

probaly want to make the money they feel they have wasted on a prop they bought from our club!

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:26 am  

Forever FC wrote: Wire now want cash for Gleeson and not players.(Daily Star ) http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/74865/Warriors-battle-for-Mart/ don't blame them Mathers is crap and Goulding would add nothing whilst your letting one of your best players leave to a local rival, at least their doing it above board unlike some.

Forever FC wrote: Wire now want cash for Gleeson and not players.(Daily Star ) http://www.dailystar.co.uk/rugby/view/74865/Warriors-battle-for-Mart/ don't blame them Mathers is crap and Goulding would add nothing whilst your letting one of your best players leave to a local rival, at least their doing it above board unlike some.

[R.B.A]

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:26 am  

If Wire want cash for Gleeson then Wigan would have to offload a couple of players to other clubs. Bet they are fielding enquiries already for half their squad. Unsettling for the players i would have thought.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:31 am  

R.B.A wrote:

If Wire want cash for Gleeson then Wigan would have to offload a couple of players to other clubs. Bet they are fielding enquiries already for half their squad. Unsettling for the players i would have thought.

Wonder if theyd do a deal with us G.horne for Carmont.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:31 am  

I'd love him at Hull think he's a great centre.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:33 am  

major black wrote:

Wonder if theyd do a deal with us G.horne for Carmont.

Don't rate Carmont.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:36 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Don't rate Carmont.

Really, based on what. (not being sarcy just curious)

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:38 am  

major black wrote:

Really, based on what. (not being sarcy just curious)

I just never have really, didn't think he was upto much when he was at the Knights. I was glad when he turned us down before moving to JJB.
He runs good lines and thats about it imo. Would much rather have Gleeson.

: Tue Mar 31, 2009 11:40 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

I just never have really, didn't think he was upto much when he was at the Knights. I was glad when he turned us down before moving to JJB.
He runs good lines and thats about it imo. Would much rather have Gleeson.

Fair enough, think he's class myself. think Gleeson's class too but comes with baggage.