: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:33 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

Anyone who suggests Thorman for FB should be banned for life. Fact.

Having seen who has in this thread, I wouldn't be opposed to that.

Re: craig hall : Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:33 pm  

bigcjlchris wrote:

if thats the case you should name the whole sodding squad on this useless thread...am i right

Not really, but I am sensing some possibilty of anger issues.

: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:34 pm  

Robbo4 wrote:

Anyone who suggests Thorman for FB should be banned for life. Fact.

Agreed.

: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:34 pm  

ash4hullfc wrote:

Having seen who has in this thread, I wouldn't be opposed to that.

good for you

Re: craig hall : Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:36 pm  

Danny 2 wrote:

whititng is far better

Not at fullback though!

craig hall : Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:36 pm  

thats why you work at Mc Donalds..please tell me you are'nt involved in any decision making

: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:37 pm  

Danny 2 wrote:

good for you

This is also good:

Danny 2 wrote:

im pretty confident hall will do well

Re: craig hall : Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:38 pm  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Not at fullback though!

why not

yes he hasnt got the speed but he has a rugby brain

: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:39 pm  

ash4hullfc wrote:

This is also good:

and how meny people were having a go

when i had a go craig hall

: Sun Apr 05, 2009 9:40 pm  

Personally I think Hall's done an ok job, but not great. His biggest weakness at fullback has to be his lack of size though, he's too easy for the opposition to throw around in the tackle.

He was key in 2 of our tries today IIRC.