Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:17 pm  

great to have him back

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:23 pm  

Could prove to be a great signing and a bit of something we haven't had since Moa left . When Tuson gets back Paea , Carvell , Ellis , Tuson , Westy and Houghton/Azza looks a great forward line compared to most teams in super league ... Fingers crossed for some luck on injurys this season . COYH

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:27 pm  

easthull fc fan wrote:

Cookies case was kr approaching him he wanted away from kath & co, so it was cheaper & better for kr to say paul approached them, hudge stayed looking sweet in rfls eyes. nothing really fc could do as he had not signed his agreed contract extension, which was very poor in house from our clubs behalf at the time.

I hope for your sake you have evidence to support this allegation, as its already been investigated by the rfl and they didnt agree with you. Perhaps you can send them this new information?

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:30 pm  

SirStan wrote:

I hope for your sake you have evidence to support this allegation, as its already been investigated by the rfl and they didnt agree with you. Perhaps you can send them this new information?

Shut up you utter tart. Everyone knows what happened. Water under bridge move on 10.5.

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:40 pm  

hull smallears wrote:

Shut up you utter tart. Everyone knows what happened. Water under bridge move on 10.5.

Nowt to do with you, I'm attempting dialogue with another species. I dont expect a reply.

Utter tart? I over-estimated your vocabulary it would appear.

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:46 pm  

SirStan wrote:

Nowt to do with you, I'm attempting dialogue with another species. I dont expect a reply.

Utter tart? I over-estimated your vocabulary it would appear.

He has a point though. It was a bit of a girl's blouse thing to say, 7 years on. I'd go so far as to say Easty-esque.

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:51 pm  

*1865* wrote:

In the Cooke situation, it was probably a failure of the RFL, as it was just a continuation of a contract somebody probably registered Cookie without even checking for a signed contract.
In this instance, it's hard to find blame with anyone but the Bulls for this situation, Carvell had rejected the newco and they've decided to just ignore that on some whim of a part of his contract which is extremely amateurish and utterly unenforceable. The RFL will have wanted to see contracts because of the whole TUPE thing.

Shock, when it happened to hull it's the rfls fault, you do it to bulls and it's their fault...

The guy Left the club to in his words win things, he's done that now he wants to return, watched a David Attenborough programme about elephants, they come home when they know their days are up too.

[Mild Rover]

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:56 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

He has a point though. It was a bit of a girl's blouse thing to say, 7 years on. I'd go so far as to say Easty-esque.

Does that mean we only have 2 years more to hear about Hudgell's comments of 2009 that some people inferred were about Hull FC's announcement of their signing of Craig Fitzgibbon?

How would Rovers have known to make an initial approach to Cooke? Rhetorical question, obviously.

Anyway, it's nice that we're all on the same page with this stuff now and can recognise sabre-rattling nonsense for what it is.

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 10:59 pm  

barham red wrote:

Shock, when it happened to hull it's the rfls fault, you do it to bulls and it's their fault...

The guy Left the club to in his words win things, he's done that now he wants to return, watched a David Attenborough programme about elephants, they come home when they know their days are up too.

Was Ben Cockayne in it, kicking back, so to speak?

[Mild Rover]

Re: gareth carvell : Wed Feb 12, 2014 11:03 pm  

Hitting the heights, the night!

Good signing for you still, I reckon. And in this season of relegation, when the RL family will no doubt be revealed to be more akin to the Borgias than the Waltons, it makes everybody but Bradford a little safer. Ta.