Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 5:57 pm  

Frank-Paul Nu'uausala & Bateman to come into their side soon .

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:01 pm  

wigan tried hard to emulate hulls score against cats earlier in season.just not good enough.

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:02 pm  

only us and wire capable of stopping wigan doing the clean sweep imo

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:05 pm  

ditchley16 wrote:

wigan tried hard to emulate hulls score against cats earlier in season.just not good enough.

Good enough to be joint top though

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:06 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

I agree....can only see one winner,hope I'm wrong but think Wigan will run our pack round.

Our pack will hold our own, if they beat us it will be in their pivots that are class above ours.

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:08 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

Good enough to be joint top though

ahem 2nd lol

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:11 pm  

I don't rate smith at 7.average personified

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:12 pm  

Long time to go before the semi but wigan looking a tough side to beat particularly when the ref lets them constantly cheat

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:15 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Our pack will hold our own, if they beat us it will be in their pivots that are class above ours.

Smith better than Sneyd?........Smith is average personified.Catalans pack is just as big as ours and they have thw best stand off in the comp and they nullified both.

Re: Round 20 : Sat Jul 02, 2016 6:19 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

Smith better than Sneyd?........Smith is average personified.Catalans pack is just as big as ours and they have thw best stand off in the comp and they nullified both.

I rate them about the same (although Sneyd has more potential) however Williams, Tompkins and O Loughlin are better than our equivalent as pivots and create things for Wigan.

I also think they have more class and pace in the backs than us, we need to beat them in the forwards.