That was/is Dannys strength and his enjoyment in doing that was visible, he hasn't lost it he's just not using it for whatever reason, possibly/probably instructed to do so.

Manu?:S

Thorman should be no where near the FB spot, he needs to be at halfback or we will have even less organisation at halfback than we have now.



Horne isnt a 7, as he has proved on many occasions int he past, his perforamnces this season with Thorman have been excellent this season, apart from Saturday.



We the players we have coming back Lee shouldnt be anywhere near the 17.



Our main problem is we are too predictable, and that comes now to coaching and selection IMO.

Aren't you the smart one mr knaggs!

We have too much organisation and not enough flair and imagination





You're right Horne isn't a 7, but in all honesty it doesn't matter what position you play him he'll still play the same way and with Thorman at FB he can spend the time we are in possession in the line and playing his normal game, leaving Horne to play his.





Great reward for an improved season so far, he's been one of our better players so lets drop him just because his name is Tommy Lee.







So why would you drop one of the few players that will do things off the cuff (Lee) and leave the other one (Hall) stood twiddling his thumbs at Full Back?

I think you are wrong on all four of your points.

For the record i don't think we should drop Tommy atm. Which is what i think Dave.K meant by saying we have better players coming back.

tommy lee does a job for the team but we wana b one of the top teams and would he get anywhere near the saints or leeds squads - nope . he's not the only 1 aswel .

Precisely. Was a good prospect, but no longer up to the standard we want to be. That said, i'm not saying we should get rid of him either, not just yet

Please can we get off the tl debate being going for 3 years now and has not worked out. he may have played well on saturday in some peoples eyes but come on .....



The bench is a joke. We are playing with 3 hookers in Berrigan , Hougton and lee. We need to play with one and stack the bench with Thackery Washy, whiting and sam .



This allows us to move the pack around send yeaman to second row and bring whiting in at either centre or stand off (the position we bought him for)



more ball players and more flexibility .

My team for sunday:-



1. Hall

2. Calderwood

3. Whiting

4. Yeaman

5. Briscoe

6. Horne

7. Thorman

8. King

9. Berrigan

10. Cusack

11. Manu

12. Tickle

13. Radford



14. Dowes

15. Thackray

16. Washbrook

17. Horne



And plan B could be to bring on G. Horne and move whiting to LF or bringing on washbrook to LF with whiting spelling manu/tickle in the 2nd row if you swap him with G.Horne.

1. Whiting

2. Calderwood

3. Hall

4. Yeaman

5. Briscoe

6. R.Horne

7. Thorman

8. King

9. Berrigan

10. Maloney

11. Manu

12. Tickle

13. Radford



14. Dowes

15. Thackray

16. Washbrook

17. G.Horne

1. Hall

2. Calderwood

3. Whiting

4. Yeaman

5. Briscoe

6. R.Horne

7. Thorman

8. Dowes

9. Lee

10. King

11. Radford

12. Tickle

13. Washbrook



14. Maloney or Cusack

15. Thackray

16. Manu

17. G.Horne



I'd play Lee in his best position and completely rest Berro ready for easter. Looked jaded and potentially carrying a knock in London. Maybe rest Cusack for MAloney (not sure on that) and limit Dowes game time. Should be enough to beat Salford Lee has been playing well and could spark us.