Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 12:52 pm  

east hull FC fan wrote:

You're not wrong there. Newton's a tool.

not the only one!!

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:15 pm  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

It was a knock on, only a slight one at that. It shows the fine margins on how a game can be won or lost.

Agree, your defence was outstanding.

You also won a game with a not so slight knock on against Cas, do you want it all your own way all the time?

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 1:45 pm  

Willa wrote:

I'm sure if you had warrington and we had quins it would have been different.

What do you win for achieving the same as us with easier fixtures????

If you argue that FC are a far superior side than KR making the 2 rounds more comparable, I will give you that one.

I really don't think FC fans should be talking about the easier fixtures this year..

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:29 pm  

barham red wrote:

I really don't think FC fans should be talking about the easier fixtures this year..

But Saints was

[R.B.A]

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:31 pm  

The part of Agars article that concerns me is that he seems to be under the impression that Lauaki can count to 10.

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:36 pm  

R.B.A wrote:

The part of Agars article that concerns me is that he seems to be under the impression that Lauaki can count to 10.

Clearly cheap shots are popular in east hull

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:43 pm  

R.B.A wrote:

The part of Agars article that concerns me is that he seems to be under the impression that Lauaki can count to 10.

As long as he can count to 6 thats all that matters

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 2:46 pm  

Isn't the point here that Lauaki did actually prove to be a big distraction for Rovers during the game? Singling a player out for rough treatment by definition means you take that energy away from other parts of your game. So perhaps when Newton says he "refuses to apologise" for these rather transparent tactics, it's the Rovers fans he should be apologising to as they played a part in Hull's victory.

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:00 pm  

Standee wrote: What a load of garbage, he got repeatedly illegally hit. Confirmation that KR are a dirty team, from Newton, "Pride of East Hull!! yes he did, and if he keeps jumping up fists flying then hell keep getting illegily hit, lets face it, the guy is an animal, teams are gonna do whatever they have to do to get the better of him, and if that means play for a reaction then thats what they will do, what team wouldnt?

Standee wrote: What a load of garbage, he got repeatedly illegally hit. Confirmation that KR are a dirty team, from Newton, "Pride of East Hull!! yes he did, and if he keeps jumping up fists flying then hell keep getting illegily hit, lets face it, the guy is an animal, teams are gonna do whatever they have to do to get the better of him, and if that means play for a reaction then thats what they will do, what team wouldnt?

Re: Agar backs Lauaki : Thu Apr 08, 2010 5:03 pm  

Rupert Pupkin wrote:

We lost the game due to a slight knock on.

no you lost because we scored MORE points than you