: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:15 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

Well we managed to outscore you by being poor so that should be a big concern to you.

Dude need i remind you that you lost!
How did you out score us ?

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:18 pm  

Tiger Bond wrote:

You probably are the better team, but the suggestion of some that we only won because you were poor is an insult to us really.

the truth is, we were poor, we played dumb, don't be so defensive, did you go tonight? when the stats show what fcs' completion rate in the first half was, then you will see how poor we was, and there wasn't much of an improvement in the second half.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:20 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

So was i...

Yeah, except I can express an opnion without resorting to petty insults.

fc baldy wrote:

Well we managed to outscore you by being poor so that should be a big concern to you.

Oh yeah, I'm very concerned. We beat a very good team in their own back yard who were unbeaten after 5 games. We're really screwed.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:21 pm  

bootie wrote:

Dude need i remind you that you lost!
How did you out score us ?

No $hit Sherlock.

Try wise....if we was poor how come we breached your defence 4 times by being poor.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:26 pm  

It was a game of If's; If Yeamo had passed, If Tickle had kicked 1 of those goals, If Calderwood had scored in the corner,
If Hall had caught 1 of those kicks or dropped balls, If Berro had passed to Thorman at the end and of course, If Dixon had missed 1 of his kicks.

We lost the plot at times with some of the silly passes. I'm still fairly pleased with the effort, it's mainly down to the execution.

[Kosh]

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:27 pm  

Tiger Bond wrote:

You probably are the better team, but the suggestion of some that we only won because you were poor is an insult to us really.

You won. We were poor. These are both facts. You're welcome to join them up how you like.

I've never understood why some fans get worked up about this TBH. You got the two points - surely that's all that matters?

I know that if we'd won tonight and gone top of the table I wouldn't give a flying one about how we did it.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:29 pm  

Kosh wrote:

You won. We were poor. These are both facts. You're welcome to join them up how you like.

I've never understood why some fans get worked up about this TBH. You got the two points - surely that's all that matters?

I know that if we'd won tonight and gone top of the table I wouldn't give a flying one about how we did it.

No, one is fact, one is opinion.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:29 pm  

Tiger Bond wrote:

Yeah, except I can express an opnion without resorting to petty insults.


Oh yeah, I'm very concerned. We beat a very good team in their own back yard who were unbeaten after 5 games. We're really screwed.

Just forget it.....said you was the better team but was raising a valid point...enjoy $hagging your sister.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:32 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

No $hit Sherlock.

Try wise....if we was poor how come we breached your defence 4 times by being poor.

Who said you were poor, like i said earlier watched you last week agaisnt Bradford and you team were awesome, a very good display.

What as Sherlock Holmes got to do with it?

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 11:33 pm  

Cas were the better team at home to Harlequins & Huddersfield - guess what we lost!

You take the rough with the smooth....