Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:43 am  

Smiggs wrote:

I've read many comments on social media and the HDM this morning relating to the article, the majority of supporters aren't buying into this I'm afraid. If Pearson and Clark thing using Dan as an extension of the club PR dept. then they've misjudged the mood of the fans.

Funny when he first started reporting in the HDM everyone said what a breath of fresh air. Told it like it was. Now he's Pearson's puppet. You can't win. The bloke in my opinion has been honest and truthful. We may not like it but it's more or less nail on the head.

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:49 am  

Everything he says is true, the unfortunate thing is the fans are fatigued by the last few years.

I believe Pearson will hold his nerve and back Hodgson. Looks like he believes the problem is the players, not the coach.

[Chris71]

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 11:56 am  

Smiggs wrote:

I've read many comments on social media and the HDM this morning relating to the article, the majority of supporters aren't buying into this I'm afraid. If Pearson and Clark thing using Dan as an extension of the club PR dept. then they've misjudged the mood of the fans.

I agree on your point that it would seem a lot of supporters aren't buying in to the plan that Dan alluded to in his article as for me it all just seems a convenient excuse and method to ask for more time yet again if I'm being honest. The fact the club in terms or Pearson and Clark are remaining silent on the recent shambolic performances and season as a whole so far speaks volumes for me.
Not sure the club are using Dan and an extension of the club PR dept as I think its Dans own assessment unless he has been given info from the club in regards to a plan (if it exists).

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 12:27 pm  

I’m giving Hodgson the time to get rid of the ones who haven’t been value for what they have been paid over the last 4 years Some will only be happy with extensions for the “lads” without asking themselves,are they and have they been the problem these past few years?

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 12:35 pm  

jimmyfivebellies wrote:

I’m giving Hodgson the time to get rid of the ones who haven’t been value for what they have been paid over the last 4 years Some will only be happy with extensions for the “lads” without asking themselves,are they and have they been the problem these past few years?

I'm of a similar opinion. The same players around when Radford was sacked, are now underperforming for Hodgson. It may not be something that is on the pitch, it could be at training, in rehab, on the WhatsApp group for the players - 'leaders' like Tag, Griffin etc. Someone has come out saying Taylor was open with everyone at Beverley RL that he hated Hodgson - if that comes out amongst the group, then it can affect everything

[Chris71]

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 12:45 pm  

Irregs#16 wrote:

I'm of a similar opinion. The same players around when Radford was sacked, are now underperforming for Hodgson. It may not be something that is on the pitch, it could be at training, in rehab, on the WhatsApp group for the players - 'leaders' like Tag, Griffin etc. Someone has come out saying Taylor was open with everyone at Beverley RL that he hated Hodgson - if that comes out amongst the group, then it can affect everything

It would seem there is an element within the team that seem to want to call the shots and run the rule over the playing squad which is there for all to see. BH has to be tough enough to make a stand and drop these players completely regardless of injuries & suspensions etc.
Still selecting these players just continues to breed the negative aspects within the playing group and will continue to be the downfall of the club until this issue is addressed once and for all.

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 1:39 pm  

Irregs#16 wrote:

I'm of a similar opinion. The same players around when Radford was sacked, are now underperforming for Hodgson. It may not be something that is on the pitch, it could be at training, in rehab, on the WhatsApp group for the players - 'leaders' like Tag, Griffin etc. Someone has come out saying Taylor was open with everyone at Beverley RL that he hated Hodgson - if that comes out amongst the group, then it can affect everything

Tag and Griffin should be nowhere near the team at the present time. They bring absolutely nothing to the team's performances and should be on their way as soon as possible, joined by lots of the others.

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 3:38 pm  

Hessle Roader wrote:

Tag and Griffin should be nowhere near the team at the present time. They bring absolutely nothing to the team's performances and should be on their way as soon as possible, joined by lots of the others.

Easier said than done to make a big overhaul, not a great market and already getting rid of a fair few, also who would sign either of these right now.

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 4:52 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Easier said than done to make a big overhaul, not a great market and already getting rid of a fair few, also who would sign either of these right now.

We'd have to pay them off or get someone to take on their full salary.

If Griffin could be tempted with a 2 year deal somewhere else he might go, but we'll be stuck with Taylor....

Re: Hodgson : Mon Jul 25, 2022 6:05 pm  

mwindass wrote:

We'd have to pay them off or get someone to take on their full salary.

If Griffin could be tempted with a 2 year deal somewhere else he might go, but we'll be stuck with Taylor....

I agree with you we are stuck with Taylor and when Griffin has played every team has targeted him because of his poor defence so i cant see any S/L club offering Griffin a contract.The club may have to try and send him out on loan to a Championship club which is his level now.