: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:17 pm  

Hull Kingston Convicts wrote:

At the Boulevard we would not cough up a 14-8 lead in the second half. Fact

i've heard it all now, the KC's at fault for all our bad rugby

I seriously hope your joking

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:17 pm  

Hull Kingston Convicts wrote:

At the Boulevard we would not cough up a 14-8 lead in the second half. Fact

Saw similar plenty of times.

[Kosh]

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:22 pm  

Hull Kingston Convicts wrote:

At the Boulevard we would not cough up a 14-8 lead in the second half. Fact

I'm beginning to wonder if you ever actually went.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:29 pm  

Kosh wrote:

I'm beginning to wonder if you ever actually went.

You are back quick

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 10:37 pm  

The Key wrote:

Why the hell would we want to go back to that crap hole? Granted, its got a lot of memories for some people (I only saw one season there and a few others before and even I have a few good memories) and had a good atmosphere but it was a terrible ground itself.
We now play in a fantastic 25k+ all seater stadium instead of a crumbling, now 1/4 knocked down, 12k+ capacity hole and some, albeit a minority, still want to go back? Theres needs to be more padded cells in this city

DID HE SAY HE WANTED TO GO BACK? NO
HE SAID HE ENJOYED THE ATMOSPHERE AT THE BOULEVARD ALOT MORE THAN THE KC
prick

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:02 pm  

K.C stadium is not the place for a rugby league side! atmosphere terrible. kc management comitee does nothing. ques for the bar. no seperate license for the rugby league. should be a place where you come to enjoy yourself instead first thing you get is five pound premiership football parking prices. and awkwardness to rugby league matches even down to the stadium comitee not paying for extra licence for drinking on the terraces.all these things are available at all other rugby league sides!!!! where are the days we all used to sit and discuss the game me and friends went to the kcfm bar and after 15 mins of queing last orders were called. kath etherington even thought she could have a better time at the rhinos and bulls game what does that say???? start thinking about the fans and not the profit and so should the team to.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:05 pm  

the KC would be rocking if we were successful, the Boulevard wasn't fun either when we were rubbish and playing awful rugby (1999 for example) people think back to the 80s when we were a title challenging side and make unfair comparisons IMO

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:05 pm  

RLPrincess wrote:

K.C stadium is not the place for a rugby league side! atmosphere terrible. kc management comitee does nothing. ques for the bar. no seperate license for the rugby league. should be a place where you come to enjoy yourself instead first thing you get is five pound premiership football parking prices. and awkwardness to rugby league matches even down to the stadium comitee not paying for extra licence for drinking on the terraces.all these things are available at all other rugby league sides!!!! where are the days we all used to sit and discuss the game me and friends went to the kcfm bar and after 15 mins of queing last orders were called. kath etherington even thought she could have a better time at the rhinos and bulls game what does that say???? start thinking about the fans and not the profit and so should the team to.

Don't get me started on Duffen, I'm pi$$ed off enough as it is...

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:06 pm  

Hull Kingston Convicts wrote:

At the Boulevard we would not cough up a 14-8 lead in the second half. Fact

You obviously never went to that Cup game vs Wigan then.

: Fri Apr 17, 2009 11:16 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

You obviously never went to that Cup game vs Wigan then.

The one we lost 22-21?

Edwards came on at HT to win the game?

Eastwood missing the penalty in front of the sticks?

Oh yes i was