Re: Lockie Lam : Thu Aug 08, 2024 3:53 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Has Clifford got a deal for next year, it might not be his first choice to come back, but he could probably get a better deal in SL than he could if he can't get an NRL deal.

Isn’t he mates with Hoy? Can’t imagine he’d be to complimentary about the club.

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 7:35 am  

Been offered a 3 year deal by Leigh.

No mention of is he's accepted it.

Very very strange situation in my opinion this one!

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 7:42 am  

Leigh are definitely announcing a contract extension on Sunday

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 7:49 am  

IF this is/was a ploy to get more money, are we then saying that if he stays at Leigh, they've offered him more then the (alleged) £300k we have offered him, esp if the offer him a 3 year deal like we have (apparently)?

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 7:54 am  

mwindass wrote:

Leigh are definitely announcing a contract extension on Sunday

Yep that would be right up Beaumonts street doing it while Myler and Pearson are there!! Next up get us relegated

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 8:10 am  

Was fun while it lasted. Back to trueman Cust and Abdul who won’t string 20 games together.

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 8:12 am  

mwindass wrote:

Leigh are definitely announcing a contract extension on Sunday

Well we all knew it so I don't feel any real sense of disappointment and we can finally move on. In reality the club probably knew a while back. Lets hope we are closing in on someone of similar or better quality because we definitely need a boost. The standard of the half we sign is going to shape where we are as a club and what the expectations are going to be next season.

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 9:49 am  

Offy86 wrote:

IF this is/was a ploy to get more money, are we then saying that if he stays at Leigh, they've offered him more then the (alleged) £300k we have offered him, esp if the offer him a 3 year deal like we have (apparently)?

Leigh won't have matched Hull's salary offer. But I suspect Leigh will be more willing to have an NRL clause in should he get an offer for 2026 and beyond.

Depends what the player's priority is.

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 10:07 am  

LeythIg wrote:

Leigh won't have matched Hull's salary offer. But I suspect Leigh will be more willing to have an NRL clause in should he get an offer for 2026 and beyond.

Depends what the player's priority is.

That's a fair point, plus having to relocate and leave his Dad.

Just can't see it happening to Hull.

Re: Lockie Lam : Fri Aug 09, 2024 10:28 am  

Offy86 wrote:

IF this is/was a ploy to get more money, are we then saying that if he stays at Leigh, they've offered him more then the (alleged) £300k we have offered him, esp if the offer him a 3 year deal like we have (apparently)?

No way we have offered him £300k per year.