Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 12:28 pm  

mwindass wrote:

I'll give you Jerry, Hill and Leutele but other than that you're in decent shape.

I'm not giving you Wardle, you swapped him for King.

Lolohea for Russell isn't a bad replacement.

I wasnt asking you to give us wardle - he's not been our first choice - which is why he went to warrington cause he was crying he wasnt playing! I meant leroy who partners jerry but I've just noticed leroy has been named this week - double bonus!!! so I will take that one back

lolohea for russell shouldnt be a replacement, our first choice squad would have them both on the field, russell in the halves tui at FB.

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 1:31 pm  

I can't be bothered to get into a pishing competition about who's got the most disrupted squad. But it's not Huddersfield.

[Chris71]

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 3:56 pm  

mwindass wrote:

I can't be bothered to get into a pishing competition about who's got the most disrupted squad. But it's not Huddersfield.

I'd hardly call Huddersfield an injury hit squad as other than McGillivray, Hill and Leutele and possibly Cogger I don't see them being too badly off when it comes to selecting a squad for the game. Ok Russell is suspended but even then they still have majority of a first 17 available as opposed to us with well over half our regular 17 sat in the stands through injury then one on suspension.

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:47 pm  

Chris71 wrote:

I'd hardly call Huddersfield an injury hit squad as other than McGillivray, Hill and Leutele and possibly Cogger I don't see them being too badly off when it comes to selecting a squad for the game. Ok Russell is suspended but even then they still have majority of a first 17 available as opposed to us with well over half our regular 17 sat in the stands through injury then one on suspension.

The fact we can only name a 20 man squad (1 more than last week, and 2 more than the week before) is more about the disruption than who’s missing. It affects preparation.

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 6:51 pm  

jools wrote:

The fact we can only name a 20 man squad (1 more than last week, and 2 more than the week before) is more about the disruption than who’s missing. It affects preparation.

Hows your academy going that played a big part in Watson going to Huddersfield for?

Just admit you haven't got it that bad compared to other teams

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 7:50 pm  

Toulouse look to have Rovers rattled. Still fancy them to rally in the second half, but it's making an interesting game

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:47 pm  

Think that's Toulouse down now.

Boo and Forward had good games listening to the Rovers fans

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:49 pm  

mwindass wrote:

Toulouse look to have Rovers rattled. Still fancy them to rally in the second half, but it's making an interesting game

Reckon that's Toulouse done for, sadly.
Jon Wilkin is becoming as irritating as Barry & Terry.

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:50 pm  

Waiting till the 74th minute to vocally back your team, shocking support rovers. Could hear a pin drop, cringey arnt they

Re: So onto Huddersfield. : Thu Aug 04, 2022 8:52 pm  

WIZEB wrote:

Reckon that's Toulouse done for, sadly.
Jon Wilkin is becoming as irritating as Barry & Terry.

I really don't get the Rovers love in from Sky.