: Wed May 27, 2009 3:32 pm  

regarding Thorman i don't know if it has already been mentioned but

the amount of people on here that were saying:

'thats a good signing ' / 'perfect player alongside Horne' etc

at the start of the season and after the first few games has got to be at least 80% - Now we can all see how much of a poor player he is and hopefully Agar has realised the error of his ways

Hinesight is a great thing when people are saying we should't have signed hi

: Wed May 27, 2009 3:32 pm  

Big Mac wrote:

I. I bet none of you would have the balls to call Thorman a turd or say that you hope that he get's injured to his face!
.

I'd like to ask him if he's embarrassed about picking up his fat pay cheque every month for doing feck all while the people who pay his wages go without so they can follow the club they love

: Wed May 27, 2009 3:34 pm  

DORIAN J ASQUITH wrote:

regarding Thorman i don't know if it has already been mentioned but

the amount of people on here that were saying:

'thats a good signing ' / 'perfect player alongside Horne' etc

at the start of the season and after the first few games has got to be at least 80% - Now we can all see how much of a poor player he is and hopefully Agar has realised the error of his ways

Hinesight is a great thing when people are saying we should't have signed hi

I said he was shiite. I also said rule and agar weren't up to it.

Sometimes I hate being right all of the time

: Wed May 27, 2009 3:37 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

Apparently Johnny Whiteley might be up for a game.

I think Richard Whiteley would be a shoe in for scrum half at the moment

: Wed May 27, 2009 3:38 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

I said he was shiite. I also said rule and agar weren't up to it.

Sometimes I hate being right all of the time

I'm not sure you are right all the time. I'll have to ask your missus.

: Wed May 27, 2009 3:39 pm  

Irish Tyke wrote:

I think Richard Whiteley would be a shoe in for scrum half at the moment

To be honest we might as well stick a shirt on a scarecrow and plant it in the pitch. Would certainly give us better defence and more attacking/kicking options than the current number 7!

: Wed May 27, 2009 4:05 pm  

Chris28 wrote:

Apparently Johnny Whiteley might be up for a game.

Johnny Whiteley might be up for Chairman .

: Wed May 27, 2009 4:11 pm  

downtheante wrote:

I'm not sure you are right all the time. I'll have to ask your missus.

She'd say I'm always wrong but she's always wrong proving I'm always right

: Wed May 27, 2009 4:24 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

NEVER IN 35 YEARS OF WATCHING HULL F.C HAVE I EVER SEEN A BIGGER TURD IN A HULL SHIRT THAN CHRIS THORMAN.....FOR GODS SAKE PI$$ OFF OUT OF OUR CLUB,YOU BRING SHAME ON THE LEGENDS THAT HAVE WORN THE FAMOUS BLACK AND WHITE IRREGULAR HOOPED SHIRT.


My new sig...

like it never a truer word spoken

: Wed May 27, 2009 4:45 pm  

Big Mac wrote:

I seem to remember this time 12 months ago when Dykes was in and out the side, and Berrigan playing at 7, all these people were saying that Berrigan should be playing at 9, the team is all the better with Berrigan at hooker.
Now I see people saying that Berrigan should be playing at 7, make up your fu**ing minds.
Instead of taking the easy option of slating Thorman, who by the way I agree was absolutely sh**e last night and yes I agree overall is not good enough for any team who wants to be classed as one of the big players, why not just accept that the club as a whole is average from top to bottom. Average board, with average coaching staff, finished off by too many average players on good contracts. I bet none of you would have the balls to call Thorman a turd or say that you hope that he get's injured to his face!
Half of you lot are just like them deluded Newcastle United to$$pots.

Think you should make up your mind if it was a bloke or a woman.....