Re: Agar Out! : Mon Mar 28, 2011 8:30 pm  

Standee wrote:

you're not suggesting hypocrisy and double standards amongst the faithful, are you?

every day that Agar remains in post is a day where Hull FC suffer as a club.

I was fishing yesterday, not that I'd have gone to London anyway but to read this:

"I thought for 60 minutes we were pretty good. We had a 15-minute spell which hurt us really badly but we fought really hard for each other," added Agar.

After all the on-line reports and comments on here from people who were at the game, it is simply another indication of just how clueless Agar is. I had to read it twice because I thought the quote was originally attributed to Rob Powell.

Does anyone seriously expect us finishing the season in a +points situation? Something that Agar has spectacularly failed to do for the last three years

Re: Agar Out! : Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:54 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

I was fishing yesterday, not that I'd have gone to London anyway but to read this:

"I thought for 60 minutes we were pretty good. We had a 15-minute spell which hurt us really badly but we fought really hard for each other," added Agar.

After all the on-line reports and comments on here from people who were at the game, it is simply another indication of just how clueless Agar is. I had to read it twice because I thought the quote was originally attributed to Rob Powell.

Does anyone seriously expect us finishing the season in a +points situation? Something that Agar has spectacularly failed to do for the last three years

Makes you wonder what happened in the other 5 minutes

Re: Agar Out! : Mon Mar 28, 2011 9:58 pm  

cod'ead wrote:

I was fishing yesterday, not that I'd have gone to London anyway but to read this:

"I thought for 60 minutes we were pretty good. We had a 15-minute spell which hurt us really badly but we fought really hard for each other," added Agar.

After all the on-line reports and comments on here from people who were at the game, it is simply another indication of just how clueless Agar is. I had to read it twice because I thought the quote was originally attributed to Rob Powell.

Does anyone seriously expect us finishing the season in a +points situation? Something that Agar has spectacularly failed to do for the last three years

I think even the ones who are not anti-Agar would struggle to agree with that comment. I think most on our coach agreed we started well for 5 minutes and finished well for 15 minutes. Give or take a few minutes of course.

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 5:54 am  

hullbg wrote:

I think even the ones who are not anti-Agar would struggle to agree with that comment. I think most on our coach agreed we started well for 5 minutes and finished well for 15 minutes. Give or take a few minutes of course.

so it's not ALL bad then ?

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:11 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

You should have a listen to the podcast then.

The events are orchestrated. You know they are.

When's the next one? We must be due one soon

If they were that orchestrated, given "The Brother" is well known, wouldn't it have been easier to have just instructed the guys with the microphones to avoid him?

FWIW I happened to be sat within 10' of "The Brother" and I don't see how you can say he was shouted down or not allowed to put his point of view across either.

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 6:50 am  

Neil HFC wrote:

If they were that orchestrated, given "The Brother" is well known, wouldn't it have been easier to have just instructed the guys with the microphones to avoid him?

FWIW I happened to be sat within 10' of "The Brother" and I don't see how you can say he was shouted down or not allowed to put his point of view across either.

Ask the brother how it felt and whether he felt able to respond

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:05 am  

Come off it, he's hardly the shy retiring type, so I can only imagine there is one point that he was unable/unwilling to repond on.

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 7:39 am  

Neil HFC wrote:

Come off it, he's hardly the shy retiring type, so I can only imagine there is one point that he was unable/unwilling to repond on.

That's not how he tells it

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:19 am  

The brother has also been banned off here for posting his version of events !!!!!!

Re: Agar Out! : Tue Mar 29, 2011 8:36 am  

Back to "Agar Out" please

Chris