Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:19 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

FFS Standee it was a joke I actually know Wolfie and he is good guy, I would pay for him to come back over a boring, negative fooker like you who has zero respect from anyone on here, doesn't understand rugby and brags about successful his business is.

Please please stop talking about spelling when time after time you make massive punctuation mistakes as if possible it makes you look like an even bigger knob.

please quote any bragging from me?

sorry..............................you can't, because I don't


but hey, crack on

and I respect a lot of people from here, especially the one's who actually KNOW ME!

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:19 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

lancaster and crooks to rovers

Club cannot be held to ransom, sorry to see them go but we cannot pay way above what players are worth that is what got us into this mess in the first place and the Club do right to try and stop it and move these high paid players on.

It's got to for teh best in the end.

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:22 pm  

Punos wrote:

Club cannot be held to ransom, sorry to see them go but we cannot pay way above what players are worth that is what got us into this mess in the first place and the Club do right to try and stop it and move these high paid players on.

It's got to for teh best in the end.

out of interest, what do you think both are worth?

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:35 pm  

Standee wrote:

my understanding is he doesn't, I may be wrong. He's a good guy and doesn't deserve people like Dave K calling him, especially with poor spelling and grammar.

we've lost a lot of the best, replaced by yourself and Punos et al. I actually miss OOK some days.

I've posted on here in various guises for over 10 years, yes people have come and gone, but one thing remains consistent - your complete lack of RL knowledge.

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:37 pm  

Standee wrote:

out of interest, what do you think both are worth?

From my point of view, what the club thinks they are worth to their team and ambitions.

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:45 pm  

Punos wrote:

Club cannot be held to ransom, sorry to see them go but we cannot pay way above what players are worth that is what got us into this mess in the first place and the Club do right to try and stop it and move these high paid players on.

It's got to for teh best in the end.

Do you think Crooks & Lancaster are highly paid at the moment?

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:52 pm  

Wildmoose wrote:

Do you think Crooks & Lancaster are highly paid at the moment?

I reckon Crooks is paid well enough.

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 5:55 pm  

Dave K. wrote:

Jake, have you ever got a rumour correct your worst than Wolfie use to be.

All the time

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:07 pm  

I have no idea what the players are being paid, I was responding to the "in the know" that they were leaving because we refuse to pay there agents demands and the club do not think they are worth what they are demanding so are off to Rovers.

Pearson has said they are trying to get the clubs salaries in order so that we can move forward and get a better playing rota with more balance, that is good enough for me.

Crookes is still under contract isn't he until end of next season, so wonder what fee we will get if he is leaving and the club hold his registration, bit like with Wigan and taylor

Re: rumours on twitter : Sat Aug 09, 2014 6:08 pm  

Kosh wrote:

All of it.

In case you cant understand

1) Gentles sacking leaked to the press several months before FACT
2) Gentle was the coach who took the club to a Wembley final and 6th place in the league FACT
3) Gentle had already recognised we needed bigger props by Signing Paea and Feka was identified whilst he was still in charge FACT
4) McDonnell was harshly dealt with FACT
5) The club have done themselves no favours with Agents and players in Australia with the dealings of Gentle and McDonnell FACT