Re: Radford out : Sat Aug 31, 2019 10:22 pm  

MorningGlory23 wrote:

She should be band, purely for been a complete Original post edited

She/he whichever account she uses seems impervious to the rules governing some posters.
She brings out the worst in me with her self righteous drivel, I'm trying not to reply to her now.

As I've previously said a truly divisive poster.

Re: Radford out : Sat Aug 31, 2019 10:24 pm  

Sebasteeno wrote:

What sort of supporter deliberately tries to suppress fans expectations of success?

What sort of fan deliberately tries to suppress fans frustrations at how poorly their team has been playing?

Mrs Barista is that kind of supporter - aka the enemy to positive expectation

I'm trying to help with some factual context Seb. I'd like to get to the GF too, but as explained, history shows that this is a difficult thing for teams outside the big 4 group. Hope and aspiration are one thing we all share. Expectation and entitlement less so.

Re: Radford out : Sat Aug 31, 2019 11:15 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

I'm trying to help with some factual context Seb. I'd like to get to the GF too, but as explained, history shows that this is a difficult thing for teams outside the big 4 group. Hope and aspiration are one thing we all share. Expectation and entitlement less so.

you love getting a bite dont u MRS B

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 12:37 am  

I run a budget here in Melbourne not far off the FC budget
Here’s the deal - I know if I don’t perform to 85% of target then I’m going on a Performance Plan to help me focus on the reason I’m paid
I’m paid to hit target and get the best out of my team. Nothing else - nothing to do with friendship in the office - no mateship. Just target and motivate to high performance
I accept in return for my nice wage

After 2 Performance plans and I’m still missing 85% then I expect the sack or be given the chance to resign in the same meeting

No sweat - thems the rules , they kind of come with being a leader/coach

LR and AL seemed to have failed at least 3 PPs in my opinion and are travelling at about 65% of AP’s target

I have absolutely no idea why he hasn’t pulled the trigger
He’s rewarding poor results with job security
He’s even more like Tim Sheens than Tim is

When LR leaves and a new professional coach comes in you will hear the players say “ it was a bit too easy under Lee”

I swear, he just needs to go, for his sake as well
He can go to Wakefield next or Fev

That’s his level

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 2:56 am  

Tarquin Fuego wrote: I run a budget here in Melbourne not far off the FC budget Here’s the deal - I know if I don’t perform to 85% of target then I’m going on a Performance Plan to help me focus on the reason I’m paid I’m paid to hit target and get the best out of my team. Nothing else - nothing to do with friendship in the office - no mateship. Just target and motivate to high performance I accept in return for my nice wage After 2 Performance plans and I’m still missing 85% then I expect the sack or be given the chance to resign in the same meeting No sweat - thems the rules , they kind of come with being a leader/coach LR and AL seemed to have failed at least 3 PPs in my opinion and are travelling at about 65% of AP’s target I have absolutely no idea why he hasn’t pulled the trigger He’s rewarding poor results with job security He’s even more like Tim Sheens than Tim is When LR leaves and a new professional coach comes in you will hear the players say “ it was a bit too easy under Lee” I swear, he just needs to go, for his sake as well He can go to Wakefield next or Fev That’s his level According to Liam Watts " What Radford says, he took it with a pinch of salt" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUciR_MBUaA

Tarquin Fuego wrote: I run a budget here in Melbourne not far off the FC budget Here’s the deal - I know if I don’t perform to 85% of target then I’m going on a Performance Plan to help me focus on the reason I’m paid I’m paid to hit target and get the best out of my team. Nothing else - nothing to do with friendship in the office - no mateship. Just target and motivate to high performance I accept in return for my nice wage After 2 Performance plans and I’m still missing 85% then I expect the sack or be given the chance to resign in the same meeting No sweat - thems the rules , they kind of come with being a leader/coach LR and AL seemed to have failed at least 3 PPs in my opinion and are travelling at about 65% of AP’s target I have absolutely no idea why he hasn’t pulled the trigger He’s rewarding poor results with job security He’s even more like Tim Sheens than Tim is When LR leaves and a new professional coach comes in you will hear the players say “ it was a bit too easy under Lee” I swear, he just needs to go, for his sake as well He can go to Wakefield next or Fev That’s his level According to Liam Watts " What Radford says, he took it with a pinch of salt" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kUciR_MBUaA

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 4:54 am  

Tarquin Fuego wrote:

I run a budget here in Melbourne not far off the FC budget
Here’s the deal - I know if I don’t perform to 85% of target then I’m going on a Performance Plan to help me focus on the reason I’m paid
I’m paid to hit target and get the best out of my team. Nothing else - nothing to do with friendship in the office - no mateship. Just target and motivate to high performance
I accept in return for my nice wage

After 2 Performance plans and I’m still missing 85% then I expect the sack or be given the chance to resign in the same meeting

No sweat - thems the rules , they kind of come with being a leader/coach

LR and AL seemed to have failed at least 3 PPs in my opinion and are travelling at about 65% of AP’s target

I have absolutely no idea why he hasn’t pulled the trigger
He’s rewarding poor results with job security
He’s even more like Tim Sheens than Tim is

When LR leaves and a new professional coach comes in you will hear the players say “ it was a bit too easy under Lee”

I swear, he just needs to go, for his sake as well
He can go to Wakefield next or Fev

That’s his level

Were you head hunted from Oriel House back in the day?
It was possibly the alacrity you showed pulling the appointment position number out of the machine.

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:16 am  

Generally interested , apart from Warrington who I know has a sugar daddy owner, which other teams are financially stronger than us? And in which areas do they exceed us, Wigans ground always looks empty at home, I'd of thought with our attendances and season pass and shirt sales we d be one of the strongest financially.

As for Radford, always gave him the benefit of the doubt, but when a team rolls over so easily, has no motivation in certain big games, and looks so disjointed tactically at times, you've got to ask why, the interviews are starting to mickey me off, it's almost just a shrug of the shoulders now and accepted which just isn't good enough.

We've shipped out the average players for next season, maybe it's now time of a change of coach as I agree it's gone very stale.

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 8:29 am  

Rocknrolla69er wrote:

Generally interested , apart from Warrington who I know has a sugar daddy owner, which other teams are financially stronger than us? And in which areas do they exceed us, Wigans ground always looks empty at home, I'd of thought with our attendances and season pass and shirt sales we d be one of the strongest financially.

As for Radford, always gave him the benefit of the doubt, but when a team rolls over so easily, has no motivation in certain big games, and looks so disjointed tactically at times, you've got to ask why, the interviews are starting to mickey me off, it's almost just a shrug of the shoulders now and accepted which just isn't good enough.

We've shipped out the average players for next season, maybe it's now time of a change of coach as I agree it's gone very stale.

Of these clubs with high turnover, Wigan and Leeds lost about £1/2 million each in their last set of reported accounts and saints about £600k.. wire made a profit but then so did we

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:01 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Of these clubs with high turnover, Wigan and Leeds lost about £1/2 million each in their last set of reported accounts and saints about £600k.. wire made a profit but then so did we

The point is that we need to be self funding as AP isn't a benefactor. McManus, Lenegan, Caddick and Moran are pretty well heeled.

On Saints, Mcmanus said recently
“As a result of the final stage of this long-term programme, we are debt free, profitable and have a net asset value of approximately £22million. We now aim to improve further going forward by way of increased operational profit."

Lenegan made £19m when he sold his software business. Simon Moran of Warrington is worth £157m and Paul Caddick who co-owns Leeds is worth £200m.

Re: Radford out : Sun Sep 01, 2019 9:03 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Of these clubs with high turnover, Wigan and Leeds lost about £1/2 million each in their last set of reported accounts and saints about £600k.. wire made a profit but then so did we

Doesn’t that make us one of the big 2, then?