Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:14 am  

chissitt wrote:

You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it.

If 26-16 is a hammering, I wonder what losing 0-80 against Warrington is called?

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:44 am  

Daniel Vidot has signed for Salford

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 11:48 am  

Wilde 3 wrote:

Daniel Vidot has signed for Salford

Carney n vidot.
Exit sets not a problem for Salford.

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 12:24 pm  

airliebird,runninglate! wrote:

Carney n vidot.
Exit sets not a problem for Salford.

Right couple of firecrackers these two. If they are paired up then I can see the return of the biff!

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 1:00 pm  

chissitt wrote:

You mean the one that was a couple of minutes from beating the big spending under achieving team and doing the double over them despite having nine players missing through injury from the team that hammered you only days earlier, how embarrassing is that for a club whose motto seems to be, we'll just throw more money at it.

Quite ironic for a club who's previous regime saw them spiral into debt due to throwing money around that they didnt have.

Oh, and I quote

"Sneyd gave Hull some breathing space with a drop-goal with 12 minutes remaining."

So, hardly a couple of minutes for your woeful outfit to cover a 2 score difference

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 2:26 pm  

ccs wrote:

Winning 18-16 with 15 minutes to go and a last minute converted try was pretty close to championship rugby.

Jake the Peg wrote "No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season". Being in front for the last 15 minutes of the match is hardly consistent with his statement.

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 3:35 pm  

Keiththered wrote:

Jake the Peg wrote "No, it's the ones who were a couple of minutes from playing championship rugby next season". Being in front for the last 15 minutes of the match is hardly consistent with his statement.

Thanks for your input. No one is interested. As for the wakey fan telling us how great they are, come back in september and tell us how it's going

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:03 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Thanks for your input. No one is interested. As for the wakey fan telling us how great they are, come back in september and tell us how it's going

No ones telling anybody how great we were when clearly we were an embarrassment, with the money you spent on players you did not exactly set SL alight yourselves, at least when we won the first two games of the season we had a full squad to pick from, where as when we beat you we were down to the bare bones, how embarrassing is that when you can't even beat the whipping boys

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:08 pm  

ccs wrote:

If 26-16 is a hammering, I wonder what losing 0-80 against Warrington is called?

We called it embarrassing HTH.

Re: RUMOURS : Tue Nov 10, 2015 4:10 pm  

chissitt wrote:

No ones telling anybody how great we were when clearly we were an embarrassment, with the money you spent on players you did not exactly set SL alight yourselves, at least when we won the first two games of the season we had a full squad to pick from, where as when we beat you we were down to the bare bones, how embarrassing is that when you can't even beat the whipping boys

You had a two week rest over our 4 day turn around, a few fc fans expected us to lose that night, after all with all the ex fc players in that squad it was like a cup final for them


didnt you have the same benefit the year before v wigan and beat them too as they had 3 games in 8 days!