Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:16 am  

kingston droolers wrote:

Its funny how on Friday Wigan would issue a statement the next day, and here we are on Wednesday with nothing, no wonder the rumour mongers are doing a roaring trade

If some of the rumour mongerers are true, and it is a legal matter, I'd guess that Wigan aren't allowed to say anything until it's sorted.

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 11:34 am  

tommyfromhull wrote:

If some of the rumour mongerers are true, and it is a legal matter, I'd guess that Wigan aren't allowed to say anything until it's sorted.

given how long it too us to sack Tansey, I'd say this has a few weeks to run yet.

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:26 pm  

Agreed, too many rumours flying around. If only half of them are true and Wigan get rid I still don't think we should sign him. If none of them are true then Wigan will have no reason to get rid.

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:34 pm  

Dont know what all the fuss is about, its all out there in the public domain, his drink driving ban, betting scandal, blackmail plot, the bloke makes Tansey look like Mother Teresa!!

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:37 pm  

VerbalKint wrote:

Dont know what all the fuss is about, its all out there in the public domain, his drink driving ban, betting scandal, blackmail plot, the bloke makes Tansey look like Mother Teresa!!

Twitter is not "the public domain"

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:54 pm  

VerbalKint wrote:

Dont know what all the fuss is about, its all out there in the public domain, his drink driving ban, betting scandal, blackmail plot, the bloke makes Tansey look like Mother Teresa!!

Where is it out in the 'public domain?'

Given that Wigan are yet to make a statement and Gleeson hasn't said anything I can't see who'd put it out in public.

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 12:56 pm  

all idle speculation being ramped up by message boards , when they have something to tell they will tell the truth.
however twitter and so on is there for all the public to read whats going on

[Karen]

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:03 pm  

ICECREAMMAN wrote:

all idle speculation being ramped up by message boards , when they have something to tell they will tell the truth.
however twitter and so on is there for all the public to read whats going on

All Twitter is is unsubstantiated rumour on a far grander scale to RLFans, I certainly wouldn't call it the public domain as to me that means it has been made official by either the club or person in question!!

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:04 pm  

Karen xx wrote:

All Twitter is is unsubstantiated rumour on a far grander scale to RLFans, I certainly wouldn't call it the public domain as to me that means it has been made official by either the club or person in question!!

If I tweet that I've won tonights lottery, bought FC and sacked Agar, is it then true?


whhoooppppeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Re: Gleeson ?! : Wed Mar 09, 2011 1:09 pm  

Karen xx wrote:

All Twitter is is unsubstantiated rumour on a far grander scale to RLFans, I certainly wouldn't call it the public domain as to me that means it has been made official by either the club or person in question!!

your not wrong either, total waste of electricity in my op
also i didnt say it was public domain I said it was there for all public to see , they just open a twitter account and off they go... same rubbish as noted on here about him i guess .. if you get my point

i have always marvelled at all the posters who "knew " everything after the event but never before the event
FWIW he is one of the two or three stand out performers of the recent SL era at centre and if available should be grabbed however quite sure that will not happen as it stands
i hear his trip to Oz is not to get a tan