: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:14 pm  

B0NES wrote:

Isn't Crocker's shirt no 13 ? .He ain't a ball playing 13 either.

He's not a prop and i wouldn't expect crocker to play 13 either

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:15 pm  

The Brother wrote:

He's making a rod for his own back with his stupid team selections

How long will he carry on with Radders at 13,if i want to see 13 men within 10 yards of the ball and 3 props playing 1 man rugby,i'll go watch an under 8 game second thoughts no they will know how to pass the ball across the pitch

So how many changes would you make to what you assume you will be Agar's 17 tomorrow? We should assume that Whiting is not fit enough for SL yet as Agar more or less said this was the case in the week. Thackray for Moa? Assuming he goes with:

Backs: Hall, Briscoe, Horne, Yeaman, Calderwood - our only 5 fit backs
Halves: Horne, Thorman - our first choices
Front row: Dowes, Berrigan, Cusack - again, our first choice
Back row: Tickle, Radford, Washbrook - again, our first choice subject to Crocker

Bench: King, Moa, Manu, Lee - our only fit/available 1st team players left bar Thackray and Houghton, whose selection people have been moaning about stopping Berro playing 80.

Don't see what's to moan about apart from Thackray.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:17 pm  

The Brother wrote:

He's not a prop and i wouldn't expect crocker to play 13 either

So....

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:21 pm  

The Thacks thing appears to be a mystery.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:25 pm  

Exiled Guv wrote:

So we win 5 and he's a great coach we lose two and he's ready for the chop, you guys need to realise that the last five years has seen this competition get tighter and tighter to a point were anyone can beat anyone, apart from maybe two teams, judge him at the end of the year and not after two losses

exactly, it isn't like 5 years ago when we were one of the few teams able to spend full cap.

Agar's made a few poor selections in the last few games I would agree. But the squad is still too inbalanced: loads of workhorses and utility players...just 1 creative half back (who Hudds didn't want any more)

and that legacy we got from Sharp is going to last a bit longer yet.

we've still made a decent start, and i think a few are just getting carried away after our winning run, I still feel this seasons team is battling for the 5th-8th positions, which is all last seasons team would have achieved without the injuries IMHO.

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:27 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

So how many changes would you make to what you assume you will be Agar's 17 tomorrow? We should assume that Whiting is not fit enough for SL yet as Agar more or less said this was the case in the week. Thackray for Moa? Assuming he goes with:

Backs: Hall, Briscoe, Horne, Yeaman, Calderwood - our only 5 fit backs
Halves: Horne, Thorman - our first choices
Front row: Dowes, Berrigan, Cusack - again, our first choice
Back row: Tickle, Radford, Washbrook - again, our first choice subject to Crocker

Bench: King, Moa, Manu, Lee - our only fit/available 1st team players left bar Thackray and Houghton, whose selection people have been moaning about stopping Berro playing 80.

Don't see what's to moan about apart from Thackray.

Forwards

Dowes
Lee
Thackery
Radders
Tickle
Washy

Manu
Maloney
King
Houghton

rest Berro and Yak ready for busy easter period

Moa run out in the reserves today

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:32 pm  

Lee
Tony
Thorman
Cusack
G. Horne
Whiting
Burnett
Maloney
Moa
Thackray
All out of contract at the end of this season, Who goes , Who stays?

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:34 pm  

[quote="B0NES"]Lee
Tony
Thorman
Cusack
G. Horne
Whiting
Burnett
Maloney
Moa
Thackray
All out of contract at the end of this season, Who goes , Who stays?[/quote]

You are Davina and i claim my £5

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:36 pm  

The Brother wrote:

B0NES wrote:

Lee
Tony
Thorman
Cusack
G. Horne
Whiting
Burnett
Maloney
Moa
Thackray
All out of contract at the end of this season, Who goes , Who stays?[/quote]

You are Davina and i claim my £5

If i was , You wouldn't be "fitting " my carpet.

[Kosh]

: Sat Apr 04, 2009 9:36 pm  

Did we lose another game?