: Sat Mar 21, 2009 9:44 am  

I think we were too over confident at times last night, With us scoring early i think many people thought we would win easy. Tickle had a rare off night with the kicks. The frenchman is the worst ive seen but you cant blame him. Defensively we didnt seem to hurt them. Anyway if anyone said we would win 5 out of 6 I dont think people would be complaining. Anything is better than last season.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 10:05 am  

People should start getting used to the fact you don't have the right to beat anyone, just the same as nobody has the right to beat us. The competition has leveled out apart from Celtic,Salford and wire anyone can beat anyone.That was the whole idea of the salary cap to take away the boring one sided 2 teams win all competitions. Now it's happening people don't like it.
We were beaten by a well organised team tonight who i thought were defensively sound and played 3 or 4 times better than us with ball in hand and more than anything they had a greater will to win.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:21 am  

fully deserved victory, draw would ave been fair result , kick up the backside required and also a ball playing thirteen , hurry up whiting we need u back,

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:29 am  

sack the coach, players are crap , must all be tommy lees fault again that were thrid in the league!! how dare Agar loose a super league match

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 11:34 am  

More errors made last night than the rest of the games this season put together. Without those we would have won, as we have done in other games. Credit to Cas they used their extra possession we gave them to good effect as we knew they would given the chance - they are a good attacking team. Nothing more complex than that - errors cost us the game.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:12 pm  

Good points by the Cas fans but at the end of the day... we still shouldn't be getting beat by Cas..

They deserved the win and were a lot more hungry for it. The Cas players reaction told all at the end this was a bit of a minor upset.

We may have been over confident but I though we paniced a bit when we went behind to them I think having the 5-0 record went against us then and we tried some daft things which cost us..

Best away fans at the KC aswell, very vocal.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 12:25 pm  

davey37 wrote:

Far more eager for the game than us as far as im concerned.

As proved by there reaction at the end of the game.

We didnt match there enthusiasm and deserved what we got.

Ding, ding , ding we have a winner.

The key difference in the two sides last night was the simple fact that they were far more enthusiastic than us. I don't mind getting beat, but imo we should never be getting out enthused when playing at home. The early try did not do us any favors, as it created a bit of arrogance within our ranks and we thought we had the game won.

Cas played the whole game with a lot more direction, and intent, both in defence and in attack. If we had played with half the enthusiasm, they played with last night the we would have won the game imo.

The challenge now is for us to ensure that this was just a bad day at the office and go to Harlequins next week and play with the same effort, commitment and work rate that saw us win our first 5 games. If we go through the motions and play like we did last night then we shall be tasting defeat for consecutive weeks.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:09 pm  

Jake the Peg wrote:

Didn't see anything from cas which should have troubled us. We were just very poor in all facets of the game tonight. Kicking game was rubbish and far too many dropped balls

As a result of the pressure we put your players under, or just rank bad play???

You decide

[Kosh]

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:11 pm  

irish tiger wrote:

As a result of the pressure we put your players under, or just rank bad play???

You decide

The majority opinion appears to be complacency leading to rank bad play.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 1:13 pm  

Kosh wrote:

The majority opinion appears to be complacency leading to rank bad play.

Just poor skill levels not sure on complacency - many of Hull's errors were unenforced.