: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:54 pm  

Forever FC wrote:

He's Dykes money plus we would have spare from that?

Or maybe Carvells I knew we have a fair bit spare

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:54 pm  

The Brother wrote:

But next year will be too late paul, i tell you hear and now he's not up to it

keep him go in to next still same results he goes Sharp takes over mid-season back to where we started from, the old this year gone wait till next year

Go get the best possibile coach ready for pre-season to take us to where we belong

I'd love to see the whole coaching staff go at the end of the season and a brand new coach/team brought in mate but I just can't see it happening.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:55 pm  

Forever FC wrote:

He's Dykes money plus we would have spare from that?

Now we are going back into last season's money, which makes it impossible for us to work out.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:57 pm  

The Hollywood Frasier wrote:

I really cant see Tansey getting paid as much as Byrne.

Plus i was under the impression we are not spending at the full cap due to the Carvell situation.

If you take Kite out of the equation its a different story though.

I guess we will see at the end of the season, I hope we get Kite and would also like a fullback if it's possible and then a good clearout too.

Time will tell.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 1:57 pm  

PAUL M wrote:

Now we are going back into last season's money, which makes it impossible for us to work out.

I know should be interesting off the field anyway

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:02 pm  

Kosh wrote:

What part of spelling players to avoid exhaustion are you and Agar having difficulty with?

Very few forwards can operate at anything like 100% for 80 minutes. We had players on the pitch who were absolutely bolloxed towards the end of Friday's game and fresh guys sat on the bench. That's just poor.

I understand the problem, I was just pointing out the other side of the argument.

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:27 pm  

Kear took us on a good cup run but we had an inconsistant league season, yet we still came 5th. In 2006 he got sacked after 3 defeats in 8 (not sure if that figure includes the Bradford cup game though).

Sharp had a fantastic 2006, but slow start in 2007. He turned us around and we came 4th (but 5th best in the league due to Wigans deducted 2 points). He was then sacked despite a 'nightmare' injury situation.

Agar takes over and despite taking us to the cup final (a win against a very poor Bradford that day, but an unusual good attacking performance in the semi) he makes us worse in the league. He starts off the season good but its obvious that it papers over the cracks with a run of 2 wins in 11 and by the time we play at home next, it will be nearly 4 months without a home win.

So the point I'm making?
Despite inconsistances, Kear and Sharp proved that they could get good rugby from the players yet they were sacked. The majority of the players in the current squad played under one or both. So Agar has no excuse for not getting better from his players. He has proved that the majority of the time, he cant get the best from his players, far from it. Very rarely have we got a performance that is on par with how well the players can actually do.
Sharp had tons of players injured, yet he got sacked. It can not be used as a defence from the board as a reason as to why we are doing poor now.
The question I have, and obviously alot of other fans now have, is why is Agar still in the job when his predessors (sp) have done better than him yet found themselves out the job? I actually agreed with the decisions to sack Agar and Sharp before, albeit Sharps sacking came a little too late for my liking. There is no excuse as to why he is in the job still. He has players good enough to not be playing so poorly, they have proved it before. He is an awful head coach and the board, for once, need to spend money on a fantastic coach. In the long term it will save them money from sacking other coaches, plus more fans will go to games and I'm sure sponsorship would go up to as a result

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 2:41 pm  

The Key wrote:

Kear took us on a good cup run but we had an inconsistant league season, yet we still came 5th. In 2006 he got sacked after 3 defeats in 8 (not sure if that figure includes the Bradford cup game though).

Sharp had a fantastic 2006, but slow start in 2007. He turned us around and we came 4th (but 5th best in the league due to Wigans deducted 2 points). He was then sacked despite a 'nightmare' injury situation.

Agar takes over and despite taking us to the cup final (a win against a very poor Bradford that day, but an unusual good attacking performance in the semi) he makes us worse in the league. He starts off the season good but its obvious that it papers over the cracks with a run of 2 wins in 11 and by the time we play at home next, it will be nearly 4 months without a home win.

So the point I'm making?
Despite inconsistances, Kear and Sharp proved that they could get good rugby from the players yet they were sacked. The majority of the players in the current squad played under one or both. So Agar has no excuse for not getting better from his players. He has proved that the majority of the time, he cant get the best from his players, far from it. Very rarely have we got a performance that is on par with how well the players can actually do.
Sharp had tons of players injured, yet he got sacked. It can not be used as a defence from the board as a reason as to why we are doing poor now.
The question I have, and obviously alot of other fans now have, is why is Agar still in the job when his predessors (sp) have done better than him yet found themselves out the job? I actually agreed with the decisions to sack Agar and Sharp before, albeit Sharps sacking came a little too late for my liking. There is no excuse as to why he is in the job still. He has players good enough to not be playing so poorly, they have proved it before. He is an awful head coach and the board, for once, need to spend money on a fantastic coach. In the long term it will save them money from sacking other coaches, plus more fans will go to games and I'm sure sponsorship would go up to as a result

Top Post

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:31 pm  

I think the main reason he has not been sacked is obvious.

1, He is cheap
2, There is no relegation
3, He is cheap
etc etc

: Mon Jun 08, 2009 3:35 pm  

hullbg wrote:

I think the main reason he has not been sacked is obvious.

1, He is cheap
2, There is no relegation
3, He is cheap
etc etc

Yup