Tea Maker wrote:
So why if it wasn't as bad as first made out, did Rovers choose not to play him in our most important games in our recent history? Now he may be signing for you, he wasn't that bad after all??? Give me a break!!
I think Rovers took a massive gamble when they saw a reason to get out of Kellys contract without paying compensation when he came back late, Probably was not wanted by Sheens and he wanted the cap space for Prince that gamble back fired big time pinching a few grand cost a million, also for all the good things they said about Campo good guy to have a round and all that he was quickly disposed of, no even reduced contract offered
I hope the Kelly deal comes off I think he will be a different animal at Fc the senior players around him will not tolerate any kind of poor discipline at the club and he will not be the one expected to carry us every week like he was at KR there was a lot put on his shoulders at rovers and I suspect he played injured most of the year like at Wembley
