Re: gareth carvell : Sat Feb 08, 2014 11:25 am
bullinenemyland wrote:
Think this dispute will only end one way and its going to be a particularly nasty one I'd guess at the moment.
The TUPE laws might cover the contractual side, but as Garreth knows full well from his previous time at Hull FC, its the registration document with the RFL that is important...
I wonder if he fully remembers signing the last contract with Hull FC under duress before his agent told him to withdraw it, only to discover he couldn't due to it being registered at Red Hall? Amazing how that has not been mentioned in any of the posts I've read.
I also wonder if he'll remember being told that he'd end up rotting in the reserves until nobody had room in the cap unless someone forked out a transfer fee? Again something that has conveniently been missed off.
The TUPE laws might cover the contractual side, but as Garreth knows full well from his previous time at Hull FC, its the registration document with the RFL that is important...
I wonder if he fully remembers signing the last contract with Hull FC under duress before his agent told him to withdraw it, only to discover he couldn't due to it being registered at Red Hall? Amazing how that has not been mentioned in any of the posts I've read.
I also wonder if he'll remember being told that he'd end up rotting in the reserves until nobody had room in the cap unless someone forked out a transfer fee? Again something that has conveniently been missed off.
Cool story bro.
Regarding things held at Red Hall, you may remember a few years back we had a player (I forget his name) who walked out on his contract because he apparently never signed it. A dubious position in contract law, but whatever. Hull FC still held his registration and were confident that the RFL would back them up. Right up until the point he signed for Rovers and the RFL cleared it without a second thought.
Red Hall has a history of staying out of contract wrangles unless there has been a clear breach of RFL rules.