Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:12 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

My patience ran out a long time ago, Paul. Long before last season, in fact.

People give a little too much credit to last season, I think. We finished 6th but had it not been for Tom Briscoe in the derby and a very lucky penalty against Crusaders we could have lost seven of the last eight.

I Radford had not been sent off we might have finished 4th, all if's and but's I guess. I understand fans wanting rid, I understand completely.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:13 pm  

ComeOnYouUll wrote:

People give a little too much credit to last season, I think. We finished 6th but had it not been for Tom Briscoe in the derby and a very lucky penalty against Crusaders we could have lost seven of the last eight.

I've seen very little credit being given for last season. People started talking about playing style last year when they couldn't criticise league position. And for the ifs and buts you mention there will be other situations that worked against us.

I said Agar needs to improve us from last year. At 0 from 3 that task is looking all the more difficult. If we are out of touch after 10 games he should be replaced. He should never have been given a further 2 years last year - 12 months at most and not as early as it happened.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:13 pm  

berrigans bitch wrote:

I totally respect your stance, I am just fed up with the situation

Me too, hopefully we get a win next week and things start to change for the team....

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:14 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Have a read of some of the comments made about something that most people on this thread didn't even see.

I have read the comments, I have being involved in this thread. So not sure why you have to tell me to have a read of them ?

So you finally agree that you can't comment on something you didn't see ?

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:16 pm  

As Droolie has just admitted to me that he couldn't actually see the hand movement that precipitated thid thread, did anyone else actually see two fingers? By all accounts it now appears to be a brush off of the hand by O'Meley to signify his opinion on how significant the 'protest' was.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:37 pm  

Superbowl Scott wrote:

The fact is the stupid fans with the banner won't have a clue with whats going on behind the scenes.
Im not sticking up for Agar as i would like him to leave/sacked but so many of our "stars" need babysitting outside of the game. Obviously Shrek had just been involved in a tough game and he's done it in the heat of the moment and will appologise tomorrow.

Its up to our "stars" to stand up and be counted, not trying to split the squad up. The only ones who are standing up are the likes of Shrek, Fitz, Whiting and Briscoe. The rest are to bothered about drama away from the game and only think about Hull FC on game days.

I think your being a bit harsh on Moa if the coach had more belief in the kid he could become one of the best props in superleague.

He always seems to give his all when Agar lets him on the pitch.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:38 pm  

Staffs FC wrote:

I've seen very little credit being given for last season. People started talking about playing style last year when they couldn't criticise league position. And for the ifs and buts you mention there will be other situations that worked against us.

I said Agar needs to improve us from last year. At 0 from 3 that task is looking all the more difficult. If we are out of touch after 10 games he should be replaced. He should never have been given a further 2 years last year - 12 months at most and not as early as it happened.

Yes replace him in 10 games time when our season is over and that is another year wasted

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:39 pm  

WormInHand wrote:

As Droolie has just admitted to me that he couldn't actually see the hand movement that precipitated thid thread, did anyone else actually see two fingers? By all accounts it now appears to be a brush off of the hand by O'Meley to signify his opinion on how significant the 'protest' was.

I only saw him wave away the Agar Out banner, but the female holding the banner was certainly flicking him the vs. I did not see O'Meley flick the vs.

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:42 pm  

kingston droolers wrote:

I hope you never play for my club again. You have lost all of my respect. Bye you waste of space

calm down idiot

Re: Bye Omeley : Sun Feb 27, 2011 6:43 pm  

He gestured to the pond life to clear off and NEVER stuck his fingers up. I've never been so ashamed sitting near hull supporters. Shouted agar out when we were losing and kept quite when we were in the game. Never once cheated the team. There's a time and place to protest no when the players are trying hard.