: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:16 pm  

stighead wrote:

why apart from dykes who have we lost that had great talent

carvell

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:16 pm  

The Key wrote:

Didn't McRae go back when we had Leeds away and Kear took over? Could have been Washbrooks first game as well but can't remember

The game when Scruton scored for us!

Dont remember Washy playing but didnt Briscoe have a try disallowed after one of our players got hit in the face by the ball?

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:17 pm  

The Key wrote:

It really does seem like I'm the one agreeing with what Agar actually says and your not. Youre going on about signing whoever is available, and I'm the one who is saying we shouldn't sign anyone unless they are the right player which is also what Agars message is also
I'm not complaining we haven't signed anyone as such, I'm complaing that we signed someone who, imo, isn't good enough to take us back to where we belong. I'm not necessarily saying we should have signed a stack of others (although I've already mentioned Carney, Ryles, Bell and Talau so I don't know why you now asking for more names). I've already said I would have had Washy and Horne in the halves until the right man came along also.
Just becaue I will back Thorman, hope he plays great and hope he proves me very wrong, it doesn't mean I can't be negative about his signing and think we shouldn't have signed him looking at how things are at the moment

my point is if we hadnt signed thorman who would we sign,we needed a halfback and nobody else was available.

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:17 pm  

if i remember rightly wasnt he injured for biggest part of season
but still a good player forgot about him

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:18 pm  

wolfie wrote:

my point is if we hadnt signed thorman who would we sign,we needed a halfback and nobody else was available.

I would much rather have James Webster than Thorman in all honesty.

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:19 pm  

wolfie wrote:

my point is if we hadnt signed thorman who would we sign,we needed a halfback and nobody else was available.

I've already said, we should have not signed anyone and waited until someone good enough was available, just like it seems we are doing now with props and a centre

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:19 pm  

The Hollywood Frasier wrote:

I would much rather have James Webster than Thorman in all honesty.

do you know why webster is at widnes and not at hull?

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:19 pm  

is webster classed as english now

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:20 pm  

stighead wrote:

is thorman classed as english now

no hes american

: Sat Jan 03, 2009 5:21 pm  

wolfie wrote:

do you know why webster is at widnes and not at hull?

Suspect shoulder?