Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:50 pm  

Geocra wrote:

Samutt fell through last minute - but like I said Phelps came...

Source - club director

If this is not true I will show my booty on the east stand concourse at the crusaders game

As far as I'm aware, the Sammut deal didn't fall though "at the last minuite", it never really got of the ground beyond "can we have him?" "Feck Off" stage of negotiations.

I'd also question the likelyhood of a director being as unprofessional to leak such things prior to an announcement and everything tied down legally.

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:51 pm  

Seat number in the east stand will do, but i doubt your a season ticket holder anyway! But we need to know who is doing the pre match entertainment at the Crusaders game!!!

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sat Feb 19, 2011 11:57 pm  

Geocra wrote:

Samutt fell through last minute - but like I said Phelps came...

Source - club director

If this is not true I will show my booty on the east stand concourse at the crusaders game

Ok. Best upload a photo of your harris on here tonight so we can compare....

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:07 am  

WormInHand wrote:

Ok. Best upload a photo of your harris on here tonight so we can compare....

Perv!

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:30 am  

Geocra wrote:

Samutt fell through last minute - but like I said Phelps came...

Source - club director

If this is not true I will show my booty on the east stand concourse at the crusaders game

Complete rubbish. Agar will be in charge to see your booty.

The board back and believe in Agar. In terms of rugby league thet have financially backed him (transfer fees are rare and we have Tansey, Westerman and Obst on the coaches decision)

Therefore Agar will not go after 2 matches to a board that believe he is the right man. However a low attendance against Leeds (despite a ticket drive by the club) signals fans voting with their feet and ultimately a loss in revenue for the club.

My understanding is that the target is 6 wins from 10. Hudds next week would be 3 losses but after that there is only Wigan away that the club would mark down as a possible loss. Therefore Agars future lies within the 5 games after Wigan (assuming we beat Crusaders). The club take a low attendance on the chin against Crusaders (watch out for the 'free tickets for schools campaign') and then after Wigan expect points on the board. I understand this period will with losses see Agar relieved of duty, with 6 wins - stay of execution until the end of season and depending on results there after see if his contract is renewed.

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:32 am  

Dibs XIII wrote:

Perv!

You know me?!

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 12:48 am  

gostrider wrote:

Complete rubbish. Agar will be in charge to see your booty.

The board back and believe in Agar. In terms of rugby league thet have financially backed him (transfer fees are rare and we have Tansey, Westerman and Obst on the coaches decision)

Therefore Agar will not go after 2 matches to a board that believe he is the right man. However a low attendance against Leeds (despite a ticket drive by the club) signals fans voting with their feet and ultimately a loss in revenue for the club.

My understanding is that the target is 6 wins from 10. Hudds next week would be 3 losses but after that there is only Wigan away that the club would mark down as a possible loss. Therefore Agars future lies within the 5 games after Wigan (assuming we beat Crusaders). The club take a low attendance on the chin against Crusaders (watch out for the 'free tickets for schools campaign') and then after Wigan expect points on the board. I understand this period will with losses see Agar relieved of duty, with 6 wins - stay of execution until the end of season and depending on results there after see if his contract is renewed.

Tbf,it was bloody freezing,and it was on sky.how many will have thought,sod it there are some cans in the fridge?

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:24 am  

True and the reserved seating on East Stand didnt help but for a team that hit a 14,000 average last season you would expect first home game to hit the same expectations. Truth is season passes are down on last season and ticket sales were poor up to the run in of the Leeds game hence family tickets and reduced prices ( I heard 10,500 ish was the expected crowd before family day and reduced prices were introduced) - thats poor when you think Leeds probably brought 1500.

Last year had the hysteria of Long, O'Meley and Fitz. This year the pre season has been an anti climax.

I expect the Crusaders game to be the 10,500 - Season passes stand at around 8000 (despite the club claims) - down on last year and no away fans and I would say 3 poor results, a poor attendance will be there.

You'll know when despairation really kicks in - watch out for 'due to good behaviour drinking is now permitted in the ground'

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 1:57 am  

Mrs Barista wrote:

Without wishing to give away my secrets, it's so easy. This fella has only 10 posts to his name. There is some correlation between low post count and mischief-making IMO so someone coming on here and making a statement that will wind up an already agitated FC fanbase with only 10 posts arouses suspicion. On his post, click on "profile", then "search user's posts" and it gives you their 10 posts. Most seem to be about Sammut being nailed on, which was not true and wound up an already agitated FC fanbase. Maybe this chappy is genuine and the rumour is true, but the evidence available suggests some caution should be exercised.

Correct, but I like his way of thinking... I believe we should listen some more!!

Re: Agar relieved of duties : Sun Feb 20, 2011 2:30 am  

thought we was havin all these Agar threads all together?