: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:40 pm  

Brasil Fan wrote:

ah hah! a new day new anti-agar post congratulations old chap.
Now you've started your crusade do you want hull to start winning or do you want them to lose to validate your point of view???
And no I am not happy with current results but I am not sure that a personal vendetta againt the coach is the best way forward.

Not a crusade he just isn't up to the job of taking this club forward he is out of his depth

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:43 pm  

I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are 2006, 2008-09 P32 W14 L18 D0 (A 44% win rate) and Sharp's were P63 W34 L26 D3 (A 54% win rate) Thoughts? EDIT: And since 1998, McRae has had the best win rate, with 55.2% from 87 matchs in charge. Source (NB, I added three losses and 3 games to Agar's stats, as that site hasn't recorded our last 3 games, which in turn made Agar's win rate change).

I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are 2006, 2008-09 P32 W14 L18 D0 (A 44% win rate) and Sharp's were P63 W34 L26 D3 (A 54% win rate) Thoughts? EDIT: And since 1998, McRae has had the best win rate, with 55.2% from 87 matchs in charge. Source (NB, I added three losses and 3 games to Agar's stats, as that site hasn't recorded our last 3 games, which in turn made Agar's win rate change).

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:44 pm  

Brasil Fan wrote:

ah hah! a new day new anti-agar post congratulations old chap.
Now you've started your crusade do you want hull to start winning or do you want them to lose to validate your point of view???
And no I am not happy with current results but I am not sure that a personal vendetta againt the coach is the best way forward.

I want what's best for the club and that's agar out

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:45 pm  

Panda92 wrote:

I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are and Sharp's were .
Thoughts?

sharpy's better than agar

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:49 pm  

Panda92 and Brither yes we know your opinion it's put forward every day. this subject could be put into a single subject called "Agar Out!" or something like that just as the rumour subject is. Not that I am complaining about the moderators you understand. But to continually have thrwad after thread on the same subject is boring and it makes finding different things difficult to find if you have a very slow internet connection as I do when on board ship. 64K between 15 computers so slow to open the SOS threads.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:49 pm  

Panda92 wrote: I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are and Sharp's were Thoughts? EDIT: And since 1998, McRae has had the best win rate, with 55.2% from 87 matchs in charge. Source (NB, I added three losses and 3 games to Agar's stats, as that site hasn't recorded our last 3 games, which in turn made Agar's win rate change). So, peter sharp has a win loss ratio only very marginally worse than McRae, intersting that considering some of the things posted about him.

Panda92 wrote: I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are and Sharp's were Thoughts? EDIT: And since 1998, McRae has had the best win rate, with 55.2% from 87 matchs in charge. Source (NB, I added three losses and 3 games to Agar's stats, as that site hasn't recorded our last 3 games, which in turn made Agar's win rate change). So, peter sharp has a win loss ratio only very marginally worse than McRae, intersting that considering some of the things posted about him.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:53 pm  

Panda92 wrote: I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are and Sharp's were Thoughts? EDIT: And since 1998, McRae has had the best win rate, with 55.2% from 87 matchs in charge. Source (NB, I added three losses and 3 games to Agar's stats, as that site hasn't recorded our last 3 games, which in turn made Agar's win rate change). Thoughts people complained about bomber before he left then things went downhill after he left. Be careful what you wish for!

Panda92 wrote: I just looked it up, and apparently Agar's stats are and Sharp's were Thoughts? EDIT: And since 1998, McRae has had the best win rate, with 55.2% from 87 matchs in charge. Source (NB, I added three losses and 3 games to Agar's stats, as that site hasn't recorded our last 3 games, which in turn made Agar's win rate change). Thoughts people complained about bomber before he left then things went downhill after he left. Be careful what you wish for!

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:54 pm  

Neil HFC wrote:

So, peter sharp has a win loss ratio only very marginally worse than McRae, intersting that considering some of the things posted about him.

But, at the same time, McRae did manage 20-odd more games than Sharp, so he was more consistent.

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 9:56 pm  

Panda92 wrote:

But, at the same time, McRae did manage 20-odd more games than Sharp, so he was more consistent.

1% better win ratio, hardly "more consistent",

: Sun Jun 07, 2009 10:02 pm  

Neil HFC wrote:

:? 1% better win ratio, hardly "more consistent",

but 20+ games is, which was my point. I