: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:13 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

disagree there dave, if smith goes its between briscoe and wellens imo.

doesn't bode well tbh, the ozzies have 4/5 genuine class fb's to chose from.

briscoe is one of the best defensive full backs going but offers far too little in attack. He wont play for England. (althought we are very short of better options, doesnt bode well)

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:17 pm  

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wellens I think someone (not me) has been playing silly buggers with that entry, sepcifically the 2003-2005 section.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wellens I think someone (not me) has been playing silly buggers with that entry, sepcifically the 2003-2005 section.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:19 pm  

Neil HFC wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wellens I think someone (not me) has been playing silly buggers with that entry, sepcifically the 2003-2005 section. Whoever wrote that is a legend! Very funny; worth lookin at

Neil HFC wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wellens I think someone (not me) has been playing silly buggers with that entry, sepcifically the 2003-2005 section. Whoever wrote that is a legend! Very funny; worth lookin at

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:20 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

briscoe is one of the best defensive full backs going but offers far too little in attack. He wont play for England. (althought we are very short of better options, doesnt bode well)

but platt or sykes? no chance imo.

i'd rather play richie owen or hall.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:20 pm  

Neil HFC wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wellens I think someone (not me) has been playing silly buggers with that entry, sepcifically the 2003-2005 section. just made me laugh out loud!!

Neil HFC wrote: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Paul_Wellens I think someone (not me) has been playing silly buggers with that entry, sepcifically the 2003-2005 section. just made me laugh out loud!!

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:24 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

just made me laugh out loud!!

Wellens wears tight pants lol pass it on

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:27 pm  

Sheldon wrote:

but platt or sykes? no chance imo.

i'd rather play richie owen or hall.

im not saying my preference, i'd play Briscoe, im saying what will happen.

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:30 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

Wellens, Reardon, Platt, Sykes will probably all be in with a chance before Briscoe. (i'd love to see Briscoe play there but i doubt it)

Briscoe would be in before all of those you've just mentioned. Wellens is finished, Reardon is poo as is Platt and Sykes is a centre.

[Kosh]

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:31 pm  

D4nnyWebbo wrote:

Tony is a hooker and we decide to play him in full back. Tbh i think we were stupid to get rid of the future england full back (Briscoe).

Coach? Is that you?

: Sat Mar 21, 2009 3:32 pm  

Big Dave T wrote:

im not saying my preference, i'd play Briscoe, im saying what will happen.

Briscoe has played consistantly well over the years, i would say he deserved a shot to prove his worth.