: Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:40 am  

Faye x wrote:

Think the Calderwood decision was the right one. Tanseys ball carrying arm hits floor and Fox still had hold of his ankle so tackle complete but the pass to Raynor was never forward Should have been a try x

TANSEY TACKLED IN GOAL ITS A TRY .IN FIELD TACKLE COMPLETE PLEASE EXPLAIN

Re: screwed : Sun Jul 26, 2009 1:44 am  

cod'ead wrote:

Before you start shouting about substandard refereeing, what about substandard coaching & management?

IS IT CODHEAD OR NOBHEAD

Re: screwed : Sun Jul 26, 2009 4:08 am  

dano wrote:

IS IT CODHEAD OR NOBHEAD

Neither, are you incapable of reading my user-name?

: Sun Jul 26, 2009 5:33 am  

barton baird wrote:

At least the game today seemed a step in the right direction,or was it just a one off derby performance?

Better effort, probably due to it being a derby, but still a million miles from where we need to be

Re: screwed : Sun Jul 26, 2009 7:52 am  

cod'ead wrote:

Neither, are you incapable of reading my user-name?

: Sun Jul 26, 2009 8:19 am  

phleastyler wrote:

just look at the table, your 11th, isnt that the same as last year??????

Our 11th what?

Rovers were very average last night, the better team lost. They certainly need to improve to have any impact in the play offs, which look like a preamble to another Saints v Leeds Grand Final anyway.

Re: screwed : Sun Jul 26, 2009 10:04 am  

BALROG wrote:

As I've said earlier, Fox slipped off the tackle before Tansey passed it. If he had stood up and carried on he would have been allowed to. Or say he was tackled from behind, Tanseys arms hit the floor but Fox rolled over him and lost contact. That isn't tackle made either.
When the pass was made Fox wasn't holding him and the try should have stood.

After the try was ruled out they showed another replay from the other side and fox NEVER lost contact he had one hand on tansey's ankle =tackle complete!!!

: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:34 am  

I suggest you watch the replay again, there is daylight between fox and tansey. He did slip off the tackle.

: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:39 am  

easthullwesty wrote:

I suggest you watch the replay again, there is daylight between fox and tansey. He did slip off the tackle.

and then grabbed his ankle to start another tackle but during the second tackle Tansey's ball-carying arm did not touch the ground. Therefore, try should have stood. Why didn't they use all of the camera angles before making the decision?

: Tue Jul 28, 2009 11:43 am  

downtheante wrote:

and then grabbed his ankle to start another tackle but during the second tackle Tansey's ball-carying arm did not touch the ground. Therefore, try should have stood. Why didn't they use all of the camera angles before making the decision?

What?and upset Justin again, wish we'd had Thaler,