: Mon Apr 06, 2009 6:53 pm  

cyprusairliebird wrote:

Unfortunately Thacks won't be featuring in the first team for a few weeks yet. Think half the City know the reason why and too be fair to the club it is the very least action they could take.

for the half that dont know, spill the beans

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:05 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Aye, it's a great plan. Drop Rich Horne into a position where he hasn't played for years and ask him to start a Derby game there.

Rovers would have a field day.

True...been a few years however he has a lot of experience in that position though from his amatuer ays..Wilkins never did too bad at 6 for saints did he..what did he say never played the position since his amatuer days.

Oh but Hall has bags of exeperience there

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:21 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Radford should be nowhere near the 13 role in any capacity. Choices like that really epitomise what is wrong with the side IMO.

And as for 'running role'... He was never quick. Now he barely gets above 'trundle'.

Completely agree, the great Knocker Norton is a galaxy away from him as loose man. I like Radders as he leads by example and never hides but a 13??? never! Thacks must return and Sam Moa should ply his trade with the reserves until he can stay the course.....well for a little more than his 10 minute cameo's anyway.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:27 pm  

cyprusairliebird wrote:

Unfortunately Thacks won't be featuring in the first team for a few weeks yet. Think half the City know the reason why and too be fair to the club it is the very least action they could take.

Let's all be knowing then!!

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:30 pm  

cyprusairliebird wrote:

Unfortunately Thacks won't be featuring in the first team for a few weeks yet. Think half the City know the reason why and too be fair to the club it is the very least action they could take.

Correct and how embarrased will all those people who wanted Ben sacked be when they know

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:32 pm  

willowred wrote:

Correct and how embarrased will all those people who wanted Ben sacked be when they know

out with it then

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:32 pm  

willowred wrote:

Correct and how embarrased will all those people who wanted Ben sacked be when they know

Depends if you can read after being sued for libel/slander.

Unless of course you are prepared to state facts on here.

Or maybe you'll spout unsubstantiated rumour, as per normal.

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:34 pm  

willowred wrote:

Correct and how embarrased will all those people who wanted Ben sacked be when they know

So you are saying he's committed a crime at least as bad as Cockayne's, then. What's he been charged with?

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:38 pm  

willowred wrote:

Correct and how embarrased will all those people who wanted Ben sacked be when they know

why would we , if hes done the same or worse then it should be bye bye

: Mon Apr 06, 2009 7:38 pm  

Mrs Barista wrote:

So you are saying he's committed a crime at least as bad as Cockayne's, then. What's he been charged with?

Did i say that