Re: Not good enough : Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:15 pm  

Black and white legend wrote:

Hall- not good enough
Calderwood-past it
Yeamo- still to live upto his billing
g Horne- nowhere near good enough
briscoe- one for the future dont burn him out
r horne-class act in the right team
thorman-not good enough
dowes-not good enough
berrigan-class act
cusack-not good enough
manu-workman like
tickle-workman like
radford-workman like
moa-not good enough
lee-need i say more
thacks-workman like
washbrook-not good enough
king-past it
need i go on. we have a very below average team that will struggle with 2 below average coaches. the future is definately black.beware.

C'mon, there not that good

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:28 pm  

I was going to post after reading that lot.. I just might split my wrists.. But there again most of those players have got us 10 points to help us to be fourth in the League table ..Last season We were wondering were our first points would come from .."Its a funny old World" see you all at the K C on Sunday Hull F C v Salford

Re: Not good enough : Sun Mar 29, 2009 5:52 pm  

fc baldy wrote:

Started early on the booze or Heroin havent you.

Looks like a cocktail of both tbf!!

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:06 pm  

This is a forum and this is my opinion. We massively over achieved against below par opposition in the first 5 rounds. believe me i hope to the great man above that I am wrong. But I honestly believe our squad aint good enough.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:14 pm  

Black and white legend wrote:

This is a forum and this is my opinion. We massively over achieved against below par opposition in the first 5 rounds. believe me i hope to the great man above that I am wrong. But I honestly believe our squad aint good enough.

You have a good squad, but need a good 7, Thorman isn't the right man for the job.

I am glad you 'support' FC and not Rovers, because 'fans' like you, no club needs.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:32 pm  

Some people must be on crack.

Why is it so negative? we have only lost a couple of games, we're still top 5. Players to come back. so why sack the coach and 90% of the team? You wasnt saying that 3 weeks ago!

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:39 pm  

Hull Kingston Convicts wrote:

Some people must be on crack.

Why is it so negative? we have only lost a couple of games, we're still top 5. Players to come back. so why sack the coach and 90% of the team? You wasnt saying that 3 weeks ago!

I was, it was and can be pretty effective, but we still played boring one man rugby when we were winning.

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:46 pm  

i never got carried away,
i think our forwards are going to get beat 90% of games this season,
and we are still not playing any were near what we should be,
to many pretenders

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:52 pm  

goldyfc08 wrote:

i never got carried away,
i think our forwards are going to get beat 90% of games this season,
and we are still not playing any were near what we should be,
to many pretenders

agree,espically when we persist with playing Dowes and Yak for 60 mins in every game

: Sun Mar 29, 2009 6:56 pm  

The Brother wrote:

agree,espically when we persist with playing Dowes and Yak for 60 mins in every game

This is where Agar loses it for me by playing Moa,he is only doing a 10min stint and they arent getting a rest because of this.