: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:19 pm  

Tiger Bond wrote:

So you lost because you played so poorly, and not just because we were the better side? Story of our season, we don't get enough credit.

You weren't the better side, we was pretty equal, except the ridiculous mistakes we made more than you.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:23 pm  

rangi chase just did a right job on us he was just 2 quick for us very much like a tommy luluai

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:24 pm  

Kosh wrote:

Boo hoo.

Welcome to our world, pal.

Not a personal attack on you mate, it just annoys me how the so called 'smaller sides' like us and Wakefield don't get the credit we deserve when we put in a good performance. The leading comment is always on how poor the 'bigger' team played.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:26 pm  

Irregs #16 wrote:

We were poor, too many dropped passes, holding back in the defensive line, wrong options on critical plays - eg yeamo keeping hold and not putting briscoe over, berro at the end offloading when he should have died with the ball on the 4th to set up for a drop goal, dowes forcing a pass after his break in the first half.

I really enjoyed cas's attacking play and sherwins flat pass was outstanding, but we nearly beat you playing poorly, and yes you were the better side, but had we have sneaked it, we would have still said it was poor

You had a 100% record, and were really on fire. Yet all of a sudden, you were just really poor? Nothing to do with us playing well.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:28 pm  

DannyB wrote:

You weren't the better side, we was pretty equal, except the ridiculous mistakes we made more than you.

Ok, but the scoreline suggests differently. Every single error you made was unforced I presume?

[Kosh]

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:30 pm  

Tiger Bond wrote:

You had a 100% record, and were really on fire. Yet all of a sudden, you were just really poor? Nothing to do with us playing well.

Did you listen to what we were doing? Unforced error after unforced error. Threw away at least one nailed-on try. Only kicked one goal from 4 attempts.

And you still only beat us by a point.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:30 pm  

we was poor, fc played dumb rugby yet still managed to outscore cas 4-3, ultimatly tickles missed kicks cost us. cas were a pleasure to watch tonight keeping the ball alive, but, the amount of drop ball we gave you, leeds, sts would've wracked up 30 by half time, thats the difference between the top 2 and the rest

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:30 pm  

Surely for you to play poor there has to be some compromise, i.e. us being good attributed to your drop in performance levels.

It could be said you were forced into mistakes etc. At least it is nice to see some Hull fans being respectful in defeat and admitting that for once there was some good play from Cas, rather than - like Sky and the SLS (and some other fans on RLFans) completely discrediting the scorelines, and just saying it was a bad day at the office for the opposition.

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:32 pm  

Kosh wrote:

And you still only beat us by a point.

1 point or 31 points it's still a win.
We missed 3/4 goals last weekend that would have won us the game.
Thats the way the cookie crumbles.

[Kosh]

: Fri Mar 20, 2009 10:33 pm  

Fully wrote:

Surely for you to play poor there has to be some compromise, i.e. us being good attributed to your drop in performance levels.

It could be said you were forced into mistakes etc. At least it is nice to see some Hull fans being respectful in defeat and admitting that for once there was some good play from Cas, rather than - like Sky and the SLS (and some other fans on RLFans) completely discrediting the scorelines, and just saying it was a bad day at the office for the opposition.

Bless.

You were the better side and deserved the win.

That's not saying much, mind.