: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:27 am  

B0NES wrote:

We still looked lost at times near the defenders try line ,Wrong players getting the right ball, No runners, but still an improvement on last season.

we did look rusty

where was berro for the 80 mins?

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:27 am  

A unknown superstar wrote:

Which struggled and only just managed to make the 40 metres!

Just Bit like saying a darts player just got it in the double.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 1:41 am  

Can I put it in simple terms that all can understand?
I thought they were reet good!

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:30 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

where was berro for the 80 mins?

Hooker. Not a bad effort from someone with no pre-season run-out to put in 80 minutes in a very demanding position and have a virtually flawless game. He didn't impose himself as he can and has, but that wasn't what was needed tonight. What was was good distribution and good marshalling of the defence down the middle. He did both exceptionally well.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 2:41 am  

B0NES wrote:

We still looked lost at times near the defenders try line ,Wrong players getting the right ball, No runners, but still an improvement on last season.

we looked lost far too often again i agree

and whilst i'm happy we've made a good start, i think theres better sides in the league than Wigan, who gave us the ball back from mistakes a lot. A good start but i hope we build and improve on that start.

but defense was much better, kicking was better, and Cusack did something other than just plod slowly into the defensive line.

still think we need another centre as well, G Horne had a good game, but i just feel a pacey/creative centre would really improve our side

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 3:05 am  

Big Dave T wrote:

:lol:

his 40/20 was off his shin!

No it took a lucky bounce

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 7:47 am  

Yes they will gel but there was some good signs tonight. Horney got his usual try and he always backs up as well which we never did last year..

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:54 am  

muddyboots wrote:

didn't he kick a 40/20?

Didn't think it was a 40/20, I thought it was given as our feed because a Wigan player touched the ball in flight.

[Kosh]

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:55 am  

Smiggs wrote:

Didn't think it was a 40/20, I thought it was given as our feed because a Wigan player touched the ball in flight.

That's what they said on KCFM.

: Sat Feb 14, 2009 8:57 am  

Smiggs wrote:

Didn't think it was a 40/20, I thought it was given as our feed because a Wigan player touched the ball in flight.

It did come off a wigan player he put his hand in the air and played at it . It wasn't a 40/20.