Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:04 pm  

I can't believe how many of you are falling for Agars mind games regarding his teamsheet.

1. Fitz was 'named' at prop, he played 13 as he has done every week.
2. Westerman was 'named' at 13, he played right back row, as he did against Quins last week.
3. Tickle was 'named' at 2nd row, he played prop.

These are FACTS! And anyone who actually went to the game should see this. It has plainly been done to please certain people/fans.

All 3 played very well in their playing positions, not their 'named' positions. So can people stop getting so excited about Fitz at prop and Westerman at 13, it didnt happen.

I only wish Agar could play his mind games this well on opposing teams!

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:08 pm  

deluded

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:13 pm  

ICECREAMMAN wrote:

deluded

As you say, deluded

or not at the match

or at the match but drunk.

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:14 pm  

so what who cares we are winning we only conplain when we lose

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:15 pm  

I can't see why this matters. They played well, we won. Is tjis the only way you can have a go about Agar this week, its pathetic.

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:17 pm  

Don't think ur rite on this one..!

Westerman did play LF, clearly seen by how and where Fitz Played, for the majority of this season Fitz has played out of his skin defensively, however him just acting as a 3rd prop has slowed down our attack considerably, he played like a prop, tackled like a prop, therefore IMO was a prop..! Westerman received the ball as 1st receiver and actuly did something with the ball. Don't just look where the players are placed in the defensive line..!

All of the above is IMHO, not having a go..!

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:18 pm  

Pointless bunkum.

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:22 pm  

Nobeerineasthull wrote:

As you say, deluded

or not at the match

or at the match but drunk.

Was at the game actually, and not drunk. So why am I deluded? I'm just stating FACTS!

And I aren't having a go at Agar, I'm very happy with the last 2 wins, I just can't believe how DELUDED some people are!

The only difference in the last few weeks is that Tickle has played prop/13, down the middle.

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:25 pm  

Axle Foley9950 wrote:

Don't think ur rite on this one..!

Westerman did play LF, clearly seen by how and where Fitz Played, for the majority of this season Fitz has played out of his skin defensively, however him just acting as a 3rd prop has slowed down our attack considerably, he played like a prop, tackled like a prop, therefore IMO was a prop..! Westerman received the ball as 1st receiver and actuly did something with the ball. Don't just look where the players are placed in the defensive line..!

All of the above is IMHO, not having a go..!

Fitzy played exactly the same as every other week, was you not at the game? We play with our 13 down the middle like a 3rd prop. How many times did u see Westerman in the middle? Not many I reckon, but I definitely saw Tickle and Fitz there alot!

[Kosh]

Re: Agar mind games : Tue Jun 21, 2011 12:27 pm  

I'm puzzled. What exactly is the point of this thread?