Re: FC v hull kr : Mon Jul 15, 2024 3:52 pm  

He does show his inexperience at times but is only 38 with not a lot of head coaching experience. I suspect he has done better than a lot of inexperienced assistants would have in the circumstances

Re: FC v hull kr : Tue Jul 16, 2024 6:16 am  

Well done Brad, Minchella crying wolf again that's twice against Brad he's accused him of doing something.

Re: FC v hull kr : Tue Jul 16, 2024 6:28 am  

Jake the Peg wrote:

He does show his inexperience at times but is only 38 with not a lot of head coaching experience. I suspect he has done better than a lot of inexperienced assistants would have in the circumstances

I don't know what to make of Grix to be honest. He's stopped us getting pumped by 40/50 points, but we still look poor most weeks.

Is he getting too much credit for us being slightly better than we were at the start of the season? Admittedly the squad has changed a fair bit and I doubt he has any say in the comings and goings

Re: FC v hull kr : Sun Jul 21, 2024 4:42 pm  

The Elliott incident involving the missing link was never reported by Elliott it was picked up by a Hull FF reporter and brought it into the public domain. Elliott was quoted as he was asked about it. The pictures are pretty damaging and there is zero doubt Fash is a dirty grub and was guilty on both counts. Only the green eyed Hull fans can’t see it.

Re: FC v hull kr : Sun Jul 21, 2024 4:47 pm  

The Cooke Report wrote:

The Elliott incident involving the missing link was never reported by Elliott it was picked up by a Hull FF reporter and brought it into the public domain. Elliott was quoted as he was asked about it. The pictures are pretty damaging and there is zero doubt Fash is a dirty grub and was guilty on both counts. Only the green eyed Hull fans can’t see it.

Whatever you say buttercup. Now run along .

Re: FC v hull kr : Sun Jul 21, 2024 6:56 pm  

The Cooke Report wrote:

The Elliott incident involving the missing link was never reported by Elliott it was picked up by a Hull FF reporter and brought it into the public domain. Elliott was quoted as he was asked about it. The pictures are pretty damaging and there is zero doubt Fash is a dirty grub and was guilty on both counts. Only the green eyed Hull fans can’t see it.

So why wasn't he charged and banned? Minchella has previous for making things up against Fash.

Re: FC v hull kr : Sun Jul 21, 2024 7:16 pm  

The Cooke Report wrote:

The Elliott incident involving the missing link was never reported by Elliott it was picked up by a Hull FF reporter and brought it into the public domain. Elliott was quoted as he was asked about it. The pictures are pretty damaging and there is zero doubt Fash is a dirty grub and was guilty on both counts. Only the green eyed Hull fans can’t see it.

And the notoriously punitive rfl disciplinary team.

Re: FC v hull kr : Sun Jul 21, 2024 7:16 pm  

Yippee try yay wrote:

So why wasn't he charged and banned? Minchella has previous for making things up against Fash.

Jealous of his hair

Re: FC v hull kr : Tue Jul 23, 2024 8:15 pm  

Anyone having trouble with their Twitter account?