Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:24 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

Which bit is wrong are we paying him or not and what would be a bigger benefit to the business for example using the money to resign Hampshire or for Chester to sits at home. I am not an expert on employment law but I would question how valid it is for us to honour a verbal contract. It is one of MC’s standard statements that nothing is certain until the contract is signed.

Because the exact quote was that he would ‘honour the terms of the contract’. However lazy journalists didn’t report that. I take that to say that an appropriate notice period would be paid, and whilst CC still had at least 2 months to run on his existing contract, any expense over and above that would be minimal.

Still, doesn’t fit your rhetoric does it?

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:33 am  

You really are a bunch of sycophants, just accept it is an unnecessary drain on already reduced income. I wonder how many of you would be on here if we had done the same for Webster for example.
We are constantly being reminded of our much reduced revenue only to then waste more on a questionable payment. I would accept severance because that would only cover the period up to the end of his signed contract not for another 12 months.
I note that Jose this is your view which is similarly based on no hard facts when it could be read to mean his as yet unsigned contract but that doesn’t fit your rhetoric does it.

[PopTart]

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:37 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

:oops: You really are a bunch of sycophants, just accept it is an unnecessary drain on already reduced income. I wonder how many of you would be on here if we had done the same for Webster for example.
We are constantly being reminded of our much reduced revenue only to then waste more on a questionable payment. I would accept severance because that would only cover the period up to the end of his signed contract not for another 12 months.
I note that Jose this is your view which is similarly based on no hard facts when it could be read to mean his as yet unsigned contract but that doesn’t fit your rhetoric does it.

Everybody has been trying to gently tell you you are wrong and just leave it alone.
As you have said, you don't know the terms agreed, or how much it was, or where the money came from.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:39 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

:oops: You really are a bunch of sycophants, just accept it is an unnecessary drain on already reduced income. I wonder how many of you would be on here if we had done the same for Webster for example.
We are constantly being reminded of our much reduced revenue only to then waste more on a questionable payment. I would accept severance because that would only cover the period up to the end of his signed contract not for another 12 months.
I note that Jose this is your view which is similarly based on no hard facts when it could be read to mean his as yet unsigned contract but that doesn’t fit your rhetoric does it.

Yep, I’m miles off

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:42 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

When he announced his departure I don’t remember him saying I will and do you actually believe anyone would fund it from their own pocket I don’t know the actual details but I do know that he is being paid and I would rather that money being used to strengthen the squad.

Again completely wrong. CC is no longer ‘being paid’

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:51 am  

Jose wrote:

Again completely wrong. CC is no longer ‘being paid’

I suppose he’s not still driving around in his company car either then?

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:53 am  

There are no company cars. They are provided by a 3rd party and the club have no involvement in them

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:54 am  

Jose wrote:

There are no company cars. They are provided by a 3rd party and the club have no involvement in them

Semantics Michael, semantics.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:58 am  

Sacred Cow wrote:

Semantics Michael, semantics.

Or just fact?

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:58 am  

Not really, because no cost lands with the Club???