Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:15 am  

Jose wrote:

Thing is, that’s just not true.

That means nothing on here.

[PopTart]

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 6:42 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

We are, unlike any other club paying for a former coach whose contract was coming to an end. It is not necessary to say this is another negative post about the club because it is I do not deny it. We admit that money will be tighter than usual next season so wasting some of what we have on a sacked coach is just folly. I guess it was forgotten we are a business and the survival of the company trumps any friendships.

Jose is right.
You should try to get the facts right before posting things like that.

I'm sure there is something else you can find to be negative about that has a smidgen of truth to it somewhere.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 7:20 am  

PopTart wrote:

Jose is right.
You should try to get the facts right before posting things like that.

I'm sure there is something else you can find to be negative about that has a smidgen of truth to it somewhere.

He doesn’t know the facts, none of us do but he speaks with total authority, makes you laugh.

I wouldn’t mind but MC has proved himself nobodies fool over and over so I seriously doubt that his heart is ruling his head. The CC deal will be the correct one whatever it is.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:34 am  

Which bit is wrong are we paying him or not and what would be a bigger benefit to the business for example using the money to resign Hampshire or for Chester to sits at home. I am not an expert on employment law but I would question how valid it is for us to honour a verbal contract. It is one of MC’s standard statements that nothing is certain until the contract is signed.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 8:44 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

Which bit is wrong are we paying him or not and what would be a bigger benefit to the business for example using the money to resign Hampshire or for Chester to sits at home. I am not an expert on employment law but I would question how valid it is for us to honour a verbal contract. It is one of MC’s standard statements that nothing is certain until the contract is signed.

You don’t know the reasoning behind it that’s the point!

There will be a very good reason for it or are you suggesting NC is incompetent or corrupt? Come on spill the beans.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:31 am  

He also doesn't know if it's Wakefield Trinity that's paying him or MC, which both are perfectly possible based on MC's statement.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:46 am  

financialtimes wrote:

He also doesn't know if it's Wakefield Trinity that's paying him or MC, which both are perfectly possible based on MC's statement.

Correct, I know nothing about the situation and why should I, it’s between MC and CC. I’m assuming MC is still the majority shareholder, in which case he is the club and can do as he sees fit.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 10:52 am  

When he announced his departure I don’t remember him saying I will and do you actually believe anyone would fund it from their own pocket I don’t know the actual details but I do know that he is being paid and I would rather that money being used to strengthen the squad.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:00 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

When he announced his departure I don’t remember him saying I will and do you actually believe anyone would fund it from their own pocket I don’t know the actual details but I do know that he is being paid and I would rather that money being used to strengthen the squad.

You have no idea do you, it’s just any excuse for a pop.

Re: Re-cap : Fri Sep 24, 2021 11:09 am  

Scarlet Pimpernell wrote:

We are, unlike any other club paying for a former coach whose contract was coming to an end. It is not necessary to say this is another negative post about the club because it is I do not deny it. We admit that money will be tighter than usual next season so wasting some of what we have on a sacked coach is just folly. I guess it was forgotten we are a business and the survival of the company trumps any friendships.

Why don't you put your cue on the rack your quest is dull. In the real world of contracts it was a verbal agreement for an extension it wasn't signed the club parted ways and a severance made do you need anything any clearer. Langi was different as he hadn't worked for the club before the verbal contract was agreed hence a nominal agreement. Now instead of looking for a negative on everything either support the club or take the negativity elsewhere it's getting tedious.