FORUMS FORUMS






RLFANS.COM
Celebrating
25 years service to
the Rugby League
Community!

   WWW.RLFANS.COM • View topic - Kate Middleton
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator20145
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 04 200815 years5th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 11:4528th Mar 24 19:20LINK
Milestone Posts
20000
25000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
wakefield
Signature
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker - Buddha
Moderator

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:12 pm  
Slugger McBatt wrote:
This is where I am.

Harry should have been a good patron as there was always the prospect of him actually liking the game and he wasn't interested. Happy to draw balls out of a bag at the Palace but beyond that, hopeless. We get to a World Cup Final and he goes to Twickers instead. Had it been a Union final in Australia and a GB game in England, he would have been on the first flight to Sydney. I doubt Kate will be any different.

In reality, it means nothing. No one will decide to nip down to Belle Vue because Kate is the patron. It makes us feel that we're being taken seriously, but when it comes to it, we won't be.


You are correct. But the patron of the rugby league is nothing to do with getting footfall at Belle Vue
It's all about publicity across media and especially the media who don't gives us the time of day normally.
It doesn't matter whether she likes the game. It's all about having a name and a face to link to the sport..... So that someone notices we have a world cup or we get better tv rights because a company may get some benefit of being linked to her etc etc.
Bigger picture.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Captain2630
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 22 20186 years156th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 17:1822nd Mar 24 13:34LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Tomorrowland

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:32 pm  
PopTart wrote:
You are correct. But the patron of the rugby league is nothing to do with getting footfall at Belle Vue
It's all about publicity across media and especially the media who don't gives us the time of day normally.
It doesn't matter whether she likes the game. It's all about having a name and a face to link to the sport..... So that someone notices we have a world cup or we get better tv rights because a company may get some benefit of being linked to her etc etc.
Bigger picture.


Genuine question PT, in the 8 years Rugby League had the highest profile royal as our patron, what good do you think it has done Rugby League?

What your saying sounds good, but realistically instead of looking into the future and guessing what good it might do can we not just look back on the last 8 years? You talk about a bigger picture but I just wonder what it actually means for the sport in terms of making a difference?

I can`t see it having any influence what so ever on TV rights, I look down the list of the 2013 world cup sponsorships, very similar to the sponsorship for this years and I can`t imagine any of them have sponsored the game due to Harry being involved, sure it could be a small bonus but it`s not the reason they sponsor.

In the last 8 years, our TV deal has drastically reduced, attendances have drastically reduced, viewing figures have reduced, is that anything to do with Harry? No, but that's the point. For me, they have zero influence on anything at all, if Kate bothers to show up to a final every once in a while we might get a 3 second snippet of her on the BBC whilst we are signing the national anthem, that's about it.

Realistically it means nothing.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Coach17871
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 24 201113 years45th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 16:0828th Mar 24 10:32LINK
Milestone Posts
15000
20000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:55 pm  
homme vaste wrote:
Genuine question PT, in the 8 years Rugby League had the highest profile royal as our patron, what good do you think it has done Rugby League?

What your saying sounds good, but realistically instead of looking into the future and guessing what good it might do can we not just look back on the last 8 years? You talk about a bigger picture but I just wonder what it actually means for the sport in terms of making a difference?

I can`t see it having any influence what so ever on TV rights, I look down the list of the 2013 world cup sponsorships, very similar to the sponsorship for this years and I can`t imagine any of them have sponsored the game due to Harry being involved, sure it could be a small bonus but it`s not the reason they sponsor.

In the last 8 years, our TV deal has drastically reduced, attendances have drastically reduced, viewing figures have reduced, is that anything to do with Harry? No, but that's the point. For me, they have zero influence on anything at all, if Kate bothers to show up to a final every once in a while we might get a 3 second snippet of her on the BBC whilst we are signing the national anthem, that's about it.

Realistically it means nothing.


And more importantly, if she is now patron of RL AND Union, which of these two sports is she most likely to lean towards, a sport played in all public schools or on that is primarily played in the state schools in the North of England.
Will anyone in the Royal Establishment know the difference ?
RankPostsTeam
International Star324
JoinedServiceReputation
Sep 24 201311 years228th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
21st Mar 24 23:4028th Mar 24 23:22LINK
Milestone Posts
250
500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 3:57 pm  
Poptart...I couldn't care less about royalty one way or tuther,my comment was a bit of fun.But I do think you're wrong if you think Kate whatshername will make much difference to how we are perceived as a sport or whether we will benefit much.People aren't stupid, they know KM has absolutely nothing in common with RL,nor will she have.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator20145
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 04 200815 years5th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 11:4528th Mar 24 19:20LINK
Milestone Posts
20000
25000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
wakefield
Signature
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker - Buddha
Moderator

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:21 pm  
homme vaste wrote:
Genuine question PT, in the 8 years Rugby League had the highest profile royal as our patron, what good do you think it has done Rugby League?

What your saying sounds good, but realistically instead of looking into the future and guessing what good it might do can we not just look back on the last 8 years? You talk about a bigger picture but I just wonder what it actually means for the sport in terms of making a difference?

I can`t see it having any influence what so ever on TV rights, I look down the list of the 2013 world cup sponsorships, very similar to the sponsorship for this years and I can`t imagine any of them have sponsored the game due to Harry being involved, sure it could be a small bonus but it`s not the reason they sponsor.

In the last 8 years, our TV deal has drastically reduced, attendances have drastically reduced, viewing figures have reduced, is that anything to do with Harry? No, but that's the point. For me, they have zero influence on anything at all, if Kate bothers to show up to a final every once in a while we might get a 3 second snippet of her on the BBC whilst we are signing the national anthem, that's about it.

Realistically it means nothing.


I think it means a lot.
Whether we are capable as a sport of using it is a far bigger question.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator20145
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 04 200815 years5th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 11:4528th Mar 24 19:20LINK
Milestone Posts
20000
25000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
wakefield
Signature
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker - Buddha
Moderator

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:25 pm  
madkeentrin wrote:
Poptart...I couldn't care less about royalty one way or tuther,my comment was a bit of fun.But I do think you're wrong if you think Kate whatshername will make much difference to how we are perceived as a sport or whether we will benefit much.People aren't stupid, they know KM has absolutely nothing in common with RL,nor will she have.


That's not the point.
It wouldn't make a difference if she loved the sport either.

What it does do is make a good image for a good marketer to make something.
Without her we are a northern sport who can't see out of our heartlands who no one cares about.
With her we are much the same with potential to bring in someone who doesn't see it that way.
Manuel 
RankPostsTeam
International Star1027No
Team
Selected
JoinedServiceReputation
Apr 15 201311 years172nd
OnlineLast PostLast Page
20th Mar 24 11:3010th Mar 24 22:21LINK
Milestone Posts
1000
2500
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:25 pm  
Who wold you prefer Snowie, Jeremy or Piers Corbin?
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Moderator20145
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 04 200815 years5th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 11:4528th Mar 24 19:20LINK
Milestone Posts
20000
25000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
wakefield
Signature
A dog is not considered a good dog because he is a good barker. A man is not considered a good man because he is a good talker - Buddha
Moderator

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:27 pm  
Manuel wrote:
Who wold you prefer Snowie, Jeremy or Piers Corbin?


Hmm that's a really tough question.
Can any of them play Hooker??
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
Club Owner4767
JoinedServiceReputation
Jan 04 200321 years119th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 15:3125th Mar 24 15:35LINK
Milestone Posts
2500
5000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Signature
[IMG]//i50.tinypic.com/a59ff5.gif[/IMG]

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 4:43 pm  
snowie wrote:
Don't give a toss for the royalty one bit for me they can do one


I swore an oath to serve the Queen for 32 years prepared to give everything for the honour, I totally and utterly disagree with your view point. The Royals bring more in than they receive the Queen is revered all over the world.
User avatar
RankPostsTeam
International Chairman35915
JoinedServiceReputation
Oct 13 200419 years15th
OnlineLast PostLast Page
28th Mar 24 08:0426th Mar 24 20:58LINK
Milestone Posts
30000
40000
Milestone Years
0510 1520 2530
Location
Poodle Power!
Signature
SUPPORT SWAG...

Re: Kate Middleton : Mon Aug 02, 2021 5:27 pm  
homme vaste wrote:
Genuine question PT, in the 8 years Rugby League had the highest profile royal as our patron, what good do you think it has done Rugby League?

What your saying sounds good, but realistically instead of looking into the future and guessing what good it might do can we not just look back on the last 8 years? You talk about a bigger picture but I just wonder what it actually means for the sport in terms of making a difference?

I can`t see it having any influence what so ever on TV rights, I look down the list of the 2013 world cup sponsorships, very similar to the sponsorship for this years and I can`t imagine any of them have sponsored the game due to Harry being involved, sure it could be a small bonus but it`s not the reason they sponsor.

In the last 8 years, our TV deal has drastically reduced, attendances have drastically reduced, viewing figures have reduced, is that anything to do with Harry? No, but that's the point. For me, they have zero influence on anything at all, if Kate bothers to show up to a final every once in a while we might get a 3 second snippet of her on the BBC whilst we are signing the national anthem, that's about it.

Realistically it means nothing.


I think you’re not getting this at all.

It’s a Royal patronage so it has to be a Royal :idea:

Being a woman is no disadvantage as there has never been any connection between being a Royal patron and the organisation you are patron of.

Do you seriously think the Princess Anne is actively involved on a regular basis with the hundreds of organisation she is patron too?

I’d have thought her being a high profile woman would be a positive for a sport chasing female participation and support.

How do you know she doesn’t like Rugby?

It’s a decent coup for the sport especially when we don’t pay for it.

Good choice imo.

As for the need for such a role, well that’s a different issue.
PreviousNext

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: alegend, cocker, FOREVERTRIN, Redscat, Spookisback, Trojan Horse and 431 guests

REPLY

Subject: 
Message:
   
Please note using apple style emoji's can result in posting failures.
Use the FULL EDITOR to better format content or upload images, be notified of replies etc...

Return to Wakefield Trinity


RLFANS Recent Posts
FORUM
LAST
POST
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
4m
Game - Song Titles
Boss Hog
34290
9m
York - 14th April
Spookisback
10
10m
BORED The Band Name Game
Boss Hog
56011
10m
Other Championship Clubs
FOREVERTRIN
98
11m
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
RobRiches
1934
13m
Rd 6 I Cas A
Sir Gregory
107
18m
Smith - should he stay or should he go
Dave K.
357
34m
Fevround 2
Trojan Horse
91
42m
The Good Friday Derby Massacre
FC Callum
135
52m
Ky Rodwell
Trojan Horse
107
FORUM
LAST
VIEW
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
1m
Spare Tickets Friday
post
4
1m
Smith - should he stay or should he go
Dave K.
357
1m
New Super League shirts in time for Christmas
The Curtism
114
1m
TV Games - Not Hull
Chris71
1385
1m
WIRE YED Prediction Competition Catalans Home
Wanderer
17
2m
2024 Southstandercom Prediction Competition Week 6
rhinosTY
36
2m
Transfer Talk / Rumour thread V4
Jack Burton
8703
2m
Fevround 2
Trojan Horse
91
2m
Challenge Cup
stpatricks
37
2m
Wigan v Sts discussion - THIS THREAD ONLY PLEASE
RobRiches
1934
FORUM
NEW
TOPICS
TOPIC
POSTER
POSTS
TODAY
Another Tigers Defeat As Rhinos Go Level Top
RLFANS News
1
TODAY
York - 14th April
Spookisback
10
TODAY
Stats article
Sir Gregory
5
TODAY
21 man Squads - Devils v Leopards
Cokey
4
TODAY
Squad for Catalan
Smiffy27
17
TODAY
The Wigan Way - New Podcast - Chairman Special
Jukesays
1
TODAY
Dons v Swinton Lions 30 June 2024
Wanderer
1
TODAY
Squad for Sheffield
AdamH
1
TODAY
London Away
Fartown58
1
TODAY
The Bulls away
terry silver
9
TODAY
The official Leon Hayes Thread
Smiffy27
18
TODAY
Saints a
WWste
23
TODAY
Leon Ruan signs on loan
Jemmo
2
TODAY
Wardle
Jo Jumbuck
3
TODAY
Huddersfield - Home
Fartown58
6
TODAY
Max Wood on loan to Bradford 2 weeks
rubber ducki
7
TODAY
Jake Wardle 5 Year deal
Zig
22
TODAY
No grade A for 2025 for Trinity
PopTart
27
TODAY
Cup Quarter Final TV Arrangements
RLFANS News
1
NEWS ITEMS
VIEWS
Another Tigers Defeat As Rhino..
78
Cup Quarter Final TV Arrangeme..
527
2024 Challenge Cup Quarter Fin..
653
Easy Does It For The Dragons A..
567
Warrington Demolish London For..
676
Leigh Leopards Beat Plucky Fea..
719
Saints Triumph Over Disappoint..
699
Easy Win for the Wolves Over L..
944
Dragons Condemn Castleford To ..
917
Leigh Leopards Secure First Po..
1060
St Helens Tame The Rhinos To W..
1035
Wigan Warriors Come From Behin..
1098
Betfred Championship and Leagu..
1076
2024 Challenge Cup Sixth Round..
3853
Featherstone Win Extra Time Cu..
1195
RLFANS Match Centre
Matches on TV
Table 'boards.stats_fixtures' doesn't exist