Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 6:25 pm  

vastman wrote:

Sorry but what team was ever picked on personality?

Read it vastman before you try shooting people....

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 7:27 pm  

Luppylad wrote:

Read it vastman before you try shooting people....

I did and I still don’t get the comment, I’m not shooting anyone down, I’m politely asking you what that comment means.

If it helps I think it’s nice that CC can pick players because they are nearly al fit at last.

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 7:47 pm  

Luppylad was expressing an opinion that he personally thought CC should go with the same 17 apart from swapping Eaves for Wood.
Never once mentioned personality.

[PopTart]

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 7:57 pm  

I thought you were joking Vasty.

He said....
simply picking itself. Personnally i think he will go with same 17 as last week

He just didn't type the space between full stop and "Personally"

Not personality.

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 8:05 pm  

vastman wrote:

I did and I still don’t get the comment, I’m not shooting anyone down, I’m politely asking you what that comment means.

If it helps I think it’s nice that CC can pick players because they are nearly al fit at last.

Think its been explained

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 8:06 pm  

PopTart wrote:

I thought you were joking Vasty.

He said....
simply picking itself. Personnally i think he will go with same 17 as last week

He just didn't type the space between full stop and "Personally"

Not personality.

Nope I get it now.

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 8:09 pm  

Luppylad wrote:

Think its been explained

Sure has I’m a big enough man to apologies, it was my misreading of the post that confused me, I was at fault.

Yes, couldn’t agree more now I know what you meant.

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 8:14 pm  

vastman wrote:

Sure has I’m a big enough man to apologies, it was my misreading of the post that confused me, I was at fault.

Yes, couldn’t agree more now I know what you meant.

I do it regular my self it's an age thing

Re: 21 for Hudds : Fri May 28, 2021 8:53 pm  

vastman wrote:

Sure has I’m a big enough man to apologies, it was my misreading of the post that confused me, I was at fault.

Yes, couldn’t agree more now I know what you meant.

And thats why i just said read it again..actually more shocked you agree with me

[PopTart]

Re: 21 for Hudds : Sun May 30, 2021 12:48 pm  

Same team as last week with Wood on the bench to replace Eaves.