Re: New Stadium Updates : Sat Oct 16, 2021 11:50 am  

snowie wrote:

from that photo it looks almost acceptable until you get up close in the light and walk around, the work done on the floodlights is brilliant and will feel the improvement in the finances over time

Great pun Snowy

[PopTart]

Re: New Stadium Updates : Sat Oct 16, 2021 12:39 pm  

FIL wrote:

Great pun Snowy

You could say it was stunning

Re: New Stadium Updates : Sat Oct 16, 2021 5:55 pm  

FIL wrote:

Great pun Snowy

Better than your efforts anyway.....

Re: New Stadium Updates : Sat Oct 16, 2021 6:46 pm  

BG....Perhaps you should...enlighten me !!!

(Has my taxi arrived yet ??)

Re: New Stadium Updates : Sat Oct 16, 2021 7:12 pm  

FIL wrote:

BG....Perhaps you should...enlighten me !!!

(Has my taxi arrived yet ??)

Its not a taxi coming for you sunshine.....
Its the green van and the gentlemen in white coats......

Re: New Stadium Updates : Mon Oct 18, 2021 10:13 pm  

Another new document added today to the plot 8 Application.

TRANS PENNINE TRAIL

This one’s only 3 pages long, but what a load of waffle. TPT (trans pennine trail) have concerns regarding number of cycle parking spaces, not enough being provided.
Inclusion of cycle parking is noted but the provision has been reduced. See 2.5 below. Cycle parking should also be secure
Unit 1 - Cycle parking provision reduced from 73 to 43.
Unit 2 – Cycle parking provision raised from 29 to 41. This shows an overall reduction in cycle parking of 18 spaces across Unit 1 & 2. The developers are asked to retain the original level of cycle parking and ensure cycle parking is safe.

Also concerns about a new footbridge, being accessible to all, I think they may have a point on this.

Is the footbridge accessible or stepped access only? Stepped only provision would not be compliant under the Equalities Act.

Footpaths, another concern.

Notes footway on northern section of Newmarket Lane carriageway – this is used by walkers, cyclists and horse riders – not just walkers
Notes a 3m footway / cycleway along the new Industrial Estate Access Road -
This new route should be signed to / from the Trans Pennine Trail / NCN?
Please note Route 67 is also part of the Trans Pennine Trail network and should be represented as such throughout the application documentation
States 2m footways on the Industrial Estate Access Road. This contravenes the stated 3m footway / cycleway in item 2.4. Or is this footway separate to the 3m noted n 2.4
As above. The footway / cycleway should be 3m not 2m. Government guidance LTN1/20 provides details.
The connection route from the TPT to the Industrial Estate Access Road should be a minimum of 3m (this is not stated) and cater for walkers and cyclists and designed to LTN1/2- standards. Equestrian access has been refused by the developer (email 23/03/2021).

The above is just an example of this document, given me an headache just reading 3 pages. Lets hope the council planning committee see some sense and pass both the stadium and Plot 8 together.

Re: New Stadium Updates : Tue Oct 19, 2021 7:39 am  

Dunkirk Spirit wrote:

Another new document added today to the plot 8 Application.

TRANS PENNINE TRAIL

This one’s only 3 pages long, but what a load of waffle. TPT (trans pennine trail) have concerns regarding number of cycle parking spaces, not enough being provided.
Inclusion of cycle parking is noted but the provision has been reduced. See 2.5 below. Cycle parking should also be secure
Unit 1 - Cycle parking provision reduced from 73 to 43.
Unit 2 – Cycle parking provision raised from 29 to 41. This shows an overall reduction in cycle parking of 18 spaces across Unit 1 & 2. The developers are asked to retain the original level of cycle parking and ensure cycle parking is safe.

Also concerns about a new footbridge, being accessible to all, I think they may have a point on this.

Is the footbridge accessible or stepped access only? Stepped only provision would not be compliant under the Equalities Act.

Footpaths, another concern.

Notes footway on northern section of Newmarket Lane carriageway – this is used by walkers, cyclists and horse riders – not just walkers
Notes a 3m footway / cycleway along the new Industrial Estate Access Road -
This new route should be signed to / from the Trans Pennine Trail / NCN?
Please note Route 67 is also part of the Trans Pennine Trail network and should be represented as such throughout the application documentation
States 2m footways on the Industrial Estate Access Road. This contravenes the stated 3m footway / cycleway in item 2.4. Or is this footway separate to the 3m noted n 2.4
As above. The footway / cycleway should be 3m not 2m. Government guidance LTN1/20 provides details.
The connection route from the TPT to the Industrial Estate Access Road should be a minimum of 3m (this is not stated) and cater for walkers and cyclists and designed to LTN1/2- standards. Equestrian access has been refused by the developer (email 23/03/2021).

The above is just an example of this document, given me an headache just reading 3 pages. Lets hope the council planning committee see some sense and pass both the stadium and Plot 8 together.

What will you do with your time when this is over

Seriously though, it is very useful stuff and keeps us all informed

Re: New Stadium Updates : Thu Oct 21, 2021 11:33 am  

vastman wrote:

What will you do with your time when this is over

Seriously though, it is very useful stuff and keeps us all informed

Well it’s not over yet, another new document today, 7 pages long.
Consultee Comment. LAND QUALITY WAKEFIELD COUNCIL
This covers amongst other matters, possibly of unrecorded mine works, risk to human health from contamination/pollutants, management plan for removal of the invasive non-native species, Himalayan Balsam.

Application Summary
Application Number: 20/02249/FUL
Address: Plot 8 Land South Of Newmarket Lane Stanley Wakefield WF3 4BU
Proposal: Full planning application for the development of two storage and distribution warehouses (19,105 sq. m and 18,260 sq m.) (Use Class B8) together with ancillary offices, lorry and car parking, hard-standing, yard, drainage, landscaping and associated infrastructure and engineering works and a new pedestrian and cycle route from the B6135 to the Trans Pennine Trail.
Case Officer: Michael Eaglestone

Comments
LAND QUALITY COMMENTS
I have NO OBJECTION to this proposal but would like to make the following comments and recommendations. These are updated comments and should be read in conjunction with our previous consultation response (15th January 2021).

I suppose the above comment could be important.

Re: New Stadium Updates : Thu Oct 21, 2021 12:30 pm  

Had all these documents to be past when they started building at Newmarket or are they new one's

Re: New Stadium Updates : Thu Oct 21, 2021 12:44 pm  

alegend wrote:

Had all these documents to be past when they started building at Newmarket or are they new one's

They will be new, completely different applications.