Reading on sky sports, Omar Kan has paid £150k for the Bulls.
Reading on BBC sport, Brendan Guilfoyle has said his main duties are to get the best deal for the creditors.
Surely a sale of six or seven of the Bulls better players would have served the creditors far better financially, than this deal assuming that the new owner will take the club debt free?
If I were a creditor I would be asking the FSA or whoever to take a closer look at all this, as something (on the face of it) doesn't add up, especially as the bulls couldn't even afford to pay the wages of these assets in the first place.