Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:21 pm  

You can spin it however you want mate, the guys dropped a right bollock with this and imo he knew full well of the implications of what he was doing.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:21 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

So what's with the MASSIVE over reaction on here to someone confirming things he was asked to confirm?

There is no objection there, he is merely stating things that has been out in public for over a year now. Some of the comments on here are totally OTT and utterly ridiculous...I wonder if this website will be hearing from the clubs legal team for some of the comments made

Take the amber and black glasses off and look at what he's actually trying to do.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:22 pm  

Trinitythefuture wrote:

Take the amber and black glasses off and look at what he's actually trying to do.

He's done nothing wrong at all.

He was asked to confirm the story about the feasibility study and if Wakefield would be able to share at Glasshoughton, he confirmed both of these that's that.

Massive over reaction by the Wakefield fans on this and you're trying to turn nothing into something for no reason at all.

Shifty Cat wrote:

You can spin it however you want mate, the guys dropped a right bollock with this and imo he knew full well of the implications of what he was doing.

No he hasn't, he was asked to provide facts he gave facts. There is no implications either - as someone else said it will have no effect on the outcome.

If Newmarket does not pass, it isn't because of RW it's because the project wasn't feasible or legal under planning guidelines.

[PopTart]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:23 pm  

If they had a legal team, he wouldn't have said what he said.

I haven't read anything that could be seen as a legal issue. No one has accused him of doing anything apart from supporting the objections for our new stadium. All people are saying is that we don't see why he needs to be involved and by getting involved he is picking the opposite side to us, which we don't think is appropriate for the Chairman of Cas.
He is starting a war (of words) that really would have been better left alone.
Even if his letter has no effect, no one will forget this and it will be an issue at every Cas/Wakefield game from now on and he'll probably find ill advised supporters of Wakefield trying their best to derail the Cas plans in retaliation.
He would have been better just saying nothing.....but he chose not to.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:25 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

He's done nothing wrong at all.

He was asked to confirm the story about the feasibility study and if Wakefield would be able to share at Glasshoughton, he confirmed both of these that's that.

Massive over reaction by the Wakefield fans on this and you're trying to turn nothing into something for no reason at all.

No he hasn't, he was asked to provide facts he gave facts. There is no implications either - as someone else said it will have no effect on the outcome.

If Newmarket does not pass, it isn't because of RW it's because the project wasn't feasible or legal under planning guidelines.

When was the green light given for the Glasshoughtin build to commence. I seem to have missed that 1.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:25 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

So what's with the MASSIVE over reaction on here to someone confirming things he was asked to confirm?

There is no objection there, he is merely stating things that has been out in public for over a year now. Some of the comments on here are totally OTT and utterly ridiculous...I wonder if this website will be hearing from the clubs legal team for some of the comments made

Yes, we'll be hearing from their legal team in due course, I'm sure.

Alternatively, his actions against our club have been commented on by members of the public. Weren't you trying to defend a "member of the public's" right to have a say a minute ago? Your lack of a solid argument is almost as staggering as your lack of morality.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:26 pm  

Gronk! wrote:

So what's with the MASSIVE over reaction on here to someone confirming things he was asked to confirm?

There is no objection there, he is merely stating things that has been out in public for over a year now. Some of the comments on here are totally OTT and utterly ridiculous...I wonder if this website will be hearing from the clubs legal team for some of the comments made

The thing is not whether you believe what you're writing or if you think RW is right or not in what he's done, the real crux of the matter is how is this perceived by the wider rugby community.

The perception whether you belive it or not is RW is trying to stop Wakefields stadium and is throwing his weight behind a no bid, defend his position all you want but it doesn't stop the rugby community uniting together to think RW is underhand and no friend of rugby league.

He could have kept quiet or took a back seat but actually chose to root himself right in the middle of the issue, he's fully aware of the power he wealds and so are the campaigners otherwise they wouldn't have approached him, are you really so one-eyed and naive to think he isn't trying to go against Wakefield.

Wakefield want their own stadium, they don't want to share with Castleford is that too hard to understand, i'm sure Wakefields board have possibly the same concerns as RW but have to chose to rise above it and show a bit of class.

I'm surprised you haven't added

Well done Richard


It's about the only thing you can get out the Cas board when you dare go against the grain, i used to like Cas, always had a soft spot for them, but this leaves a bad taste in the mouth.

[PopTart]

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:29 pm  

.....and to be honest, if his letter made a difference, and we lost the chance of this stadium......is anyone at Wakefield likely to support a move to Glasshoughton now?
Think the other choices would be used first.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:30 pm  

A sad and desperate act from a sad and desperate little man.

Are Cas not currently against a development gaining a renewal on its planning permission in Cas town cente and are currently having fans object against it as it could well scupper their chances of a supermarket ever been built on WR. Maybe we should all write in support of the development. Eye for an eye and all that. Thats how petty and pathetic this has become.

Re: Public Inquiry : Tue Dec 06, 2011 5:31 pm  

PopTart wrote:

.....and to be honest, if his letter made a difference, and we lost the chance of this stadium......is anyone at Wakefield likely to support a move to Glasshoughton now?
Think the other choices would be used first.

You could always share with Rovers