Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:06 pm  

cocker wrote:

Oh and Sammutt had a good game at fullback, saved a couple of tries and was involved in all attacks.

No, never, he cant have.....that isn't possible....surely you've got that wrong.....

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:08 pm  

Sorry but having effort there is the minimum requirement, it should be a given not a bonus. But these players are better than they are performing but it just not happening and that is down to the coaching they are receiving. If Agar stays the only way that this team will stay up is if the bulls don't get their points back. Now i'm of the opinion that this team is better than that and has the ability to stay up whether the deduction is rescinded or not, but it won't happen as we are. It is time for change.

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:10 pm  

upthecats wrote:

No, never, he cant have.....that isn't possible....surely you've got that wrong.....

He would have had a better game at stand off. Sykes had some good ball and position but only thing I remember him doing is throwing an intercept for 6 points. If you take away the 18 we gifted them from our own stupid mistakes it would have been a 2 point ball game

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:15 pm  

But equally Sykes or Mathers might have had a much worse game at full back and may have cost us 3 or 4 tries? That's the problem when you need to accomodate a few players throughout the side who are a fair bit past their best.....about finding the best balance throughout the side....an absolute thankless task and one you will always get people questioning....just glad a few have got back from the game and said a few positive things.....can take heart for the Hull game now and dare I say it....look forward to it....

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:16 pm  

upthecats wrote:

No, never, he cant have.....that isn't possible....surely you've got that wrong.....

He also made two mistakes that lead directly to Huddersfield tries. Now if he'd have been in the halves....

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:20 pm  

I don't personally think its a disadvantage to our attack having Sammut at fullback, he is involved in everything. The problem is Sykes at halfback . Think Harry will come good if given a fair shot, perhaps Siejka and Godinet ???? Definitely keep Mathers from fullback ,its a pleasure to see some-one catching the ball on the full and making one-on-one tackles when needed.

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:22 pm  

I thought the mistakes he made looked down to tiredness as much as anything, he was one who gave his all on Friday as well. I just thought he had a good game today...

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:31 pm  

I suppose we should be grateful. Putting effort in? Well how jolly good of them. Just showa how low expectations are now. A twenty point loss doesn't seem quite so bad now.

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:32 pm  

Sammuts problem is he is always prone to a major blooper like today and that is much more exposed and often more costly at fullback. He gets his hands on the ball just as much at stand off but is less likely to cost a try. Fullback is a problem but for me sammut is better served in the halves alongside Godinet. McShane and Wildie to rotate at hooker. Siejka was signed before Sammut but didn't arrive til afterwards. Unless he is a decent fullback then for me he is the odd one out.

Re: Agar Out Part Four : Mon Apr 21, 2014 5:37 pm  

Khlav Kalash wrote:

I suppose we should be grateful. Putting effort in? Well how jolly good of them. Just showa how low expectations are now. A twenty point loss doesn't seem quite so bad now.

That's the thing, some people will be happy with today's result after the shed load of points we have conceded lately.
Finishing 12th this year is acceptable but no one is coming up, so I fear for us next year.
Who is going to help us next season?
We should be aiming for 10th this year.