gutterfax wrote:
Sorry, I was generalising. The point I was trying to make (badly) was that a stadium that gets used 26 times a season (more for play-offs) and offers something to the community, whilst clearing the development debt, has got to be better than 2 stadiums, used 13 times doing the same other stuff in an area that compares to some London Boroughs. It just seems insane.
The same goes for Leigh and the Goons....why build the new stadium that will lose money in the long run, when there is a state of the art one nearby?
I would never say that merger is the way forward....just common sense dictates that you will both be in the same situ in 2 years and one of you in danger of going down.
The same goes for Leigh and the Goons....why build the new stadium that will lose money in the long run, when there is a state of the art one nearby?
I would never say that merger is the way forward....just common sense dictates that you will both be in the same situ in 2 years and one of you in danger of going down.
you have obviously not read Cas' latest statement or any made previous by the club, we are workign hard with local agencies and WMDC to ensure sufficient facilities are put into the stadium to make ours (Cas) a community staium which is capable fo being used 7 days a week! the thought of a stadium being used 13 times a season as you suggest is not viable!!!
our stadium will have a range of community facilities for local schools and business to use, amongst many more things such as function rooms banqueting suits and leisure facilities. with our stadium forming part of the glasshoughton development which includes Xscape (one UK's top tourist attractions) the stadium will be a 7 day a week facility which the whole community and business's will benifit from.